The writer of Matthew has no mention of the "miracle" aka metaphorical catch. He's jewish and doesn't need to expand on the whole "follow me malarkey" He copies Mark 1:16-20 almost exactly...word for word.

the anonymous writer of Luke being a good greek boy has to have an allegory in there, i.e making the lesson twice about an abundance of fish and "you shall be fishers of men" so he expands the original story to include a "miracle" *gasps from audience*

John follows a later tradition of writing purporting to be eyewitness accounts (they were not) and doesn't mention fishing boats or Peter's (Cephas') occupation at all in the recruitment. Funnily he doesn't mention James or himself,(John) who, according to the earlier Mark were recruited at the same time, in the same location, from the same occupation. Almost as if the writer of 'John' wasn't actually there and wasn't the John that allegedly wrote the gospel.

Are you seriously unable to see the contradictions and understand who copied what from whom. KNOWING that NONE of the gospels are eyewitness accounts?

.
The whole mythical Jesus scenario starts with it being to easy to become a pseudo-christian to begin with. All the Kool Aid drinker has to do is accept that Jesus died and sacrificed for their sins, which rationally He did not, and then you say a couple of placating words to Him and send them skyward, and *poof,* one becomes a pseudo-christian!

I am probably preaching to the choir, but the first historical mention of this mythical Jesus character is from Josephus Flavius who was a Roman Jewish Historian, where his alleged hearsay non eyewitness statements about this Jesus character in his Antiquities were overall disturbing to the astute rational thinker.

Barring the fact of many historians stating that what Josephus wrote about Jesus in a minute way were interpolations, the simple math is revealed nonetheless: Mythical Jesus died approximately in 36AD, Jospehus birth was 37AD, Josephus Antiquities were written in 97AD mentioning through hearsay non eyewitness accounts, a Jesus “character,” where he was not at all mentioned as the brutal serial killer Hebrew Yahweh God incarnate, the creator of man and the entire universe!

Such a notable one God concept would have been mentioned ad infinitum in historical records and writings in Roman, Greek, and Jewish history from the day of his celestial impregnation to the whore Mary as a bastard child, until his death and until the end of time, but it was not! It is like Neil Armstrong landing on the moon and walking on it for the first time in the history of man, and having not a single person write about it during the time it occurred and subsequenly, but only 61 years later as equal to Josephus’ interpolations were written within his Antiquities about a bible Jesus. Laughable!

Therefore, what mental state would accept the above historical embarrassing facts, that is if they actually knew about said facts? Yes, the inept mindset of a pseudo-christian.

Any subsequent historical hearsay and non eyewitness writers like Tacitus, et al, about the alleged Jesus character to Josephus’ time period, only gets more embarrassing as the years add on to the Jesus myth. Subsequently, societies have been paying dearly for the ruse of Christianity and its pagan and primitive beginnings.

.

Just a test to see if this thread is active.