@ Gabriel

( Answer to to your previous post: http://www.atheistrepublic.com/comment/41748 )

- "It's funny that you make a big deal of this phrase, but have not answered any of my questions. What this means is, you harp on the minor points to avoid speaking on the bigger issues presented to you, which evidentially, you have nothing to offer."

This is just an immature and childish attempt at trying to trigger anger to get what you want. Such comments only reveal your nature and you are making a mockery of yourself.

To explain this conundrum for you:
I offer nothing for you but questions, because there is absolutely no point in telling you that I believe in The Big Bang Theory because it is the most proven theory, that I am very confident in The Theory of Evolution because it has such a massive amount of supporting evidence that it would be laughable to deny it (unless one is completely unaware about the evidence), that I believe that the most plausible answer to how life began is Abiogenesis because even if it's still somewhat lacking in evidence there is nothing even close to being a more likely explanation, that regarding the questions "what caused the Big Bang" or "what was before the Big Bang", the answer is simply: I don't know, I'm not even sure those are valid questions.

So why do I say "there is absolutely no point in telling you" this?
I have already tried (as have many others) and you have shown again and again that even though the the evidence is readily available, you are either unaware of it or choose to ignore it from a desperate urge to believe in magic and unjustified claims. I don't think for a second that you are going to debate fairly or listen to valid argumentation, you have proven that in abundance already, plus taxes.

Your assertions are so full of holes that I get embarrassed for you when I read them. These holes have been pointed out to you over and over again, but you just look away and claim to "find no resistance". It's like talking to a stubborn child who decided to not give in, no matter what anyone says or how ridiculous it looks.

You have clearly shown that there can be no productive debate with you about these things, so instead I have been offering only question about your assertions. And your unwillingness to discuss them is very telling how baseless your assumptions are.

Have you noticed how I am more or less the only one still replying to you?
Everyone else have already realized that trying to debate with you is a complete and utter waste of time. You would never ever accept anything that would change your mind so there can be no honest debate. I'm the only one stupid and naive enough to have carried on this far.

Your are still (!!!) absurdly enough, trying to dictate what others must say to debate you and you are still (!!!) demanding evidence but giving none yourself. It's so obvious how you are trying to force the discussion to get what you want, that again, I get embarrassed for you when reading stuff like this:

- "If you're going to say that my conclusion is "simply erroneous" that a mind can't be responsible for every organized, synergistic, and fine-tuning project in our world, then (for the millionth time), give an alternative. Don't just say..."

BTW: This was a Straw-man argument, I would never say "a mind can't be responsible for every organized, synergistic, and fine-tuning project in our world". You just see what you want to see, then spew out your pre-programmed remarks that are only based on what you want to see. It's only further proof of the futility of debating with you.

You show no shame or integrity what so ever. There is no point in wasting a second more on trying to have a productive discussion with someone who wants to decide what others must say, what one is "force to accept", what the conclusions must be and even what other the other part has said.