Same empty rhetoric you've been espousing from the first, but you still can't demonstrate any objective evidence for your vapid creationist myth, or your magic sky fairy? Explain to us how magic apples work please? Explain hos a snake can talk? Explain how, and why, your fictional deity created a creature to look like a leaf, to avoid being eaten alive by predators you believe he created with the express purpose of eating it alive?

"you think it happened by chance"

No, as you have been told, you;re simply repeating your vapid lie to obfuscate.

"I got a bridge to sell you, it comes down to your dishonesty touting the odds as normal"

All you are selling is a puerile vapid superstition, and no one is buying, hence your histrionics in this thread afetr your verbiage was rejected. As for dishonesty that's ironic since it's another lie from you, as you were the one who implied the odds for a process you know nothing about were improbable, but when I asked you what the dds were, and how you calculated them you could demonstrate no facts or evidence to support your asinine empty made up claim, hardly a surprise as that seems to be your raison d'etre.

Species evolution remains a scientific fact, supported by all the scientific evidence, I need make no claims on it's behalf, and you're the one denying a scientific fact here, nit me, so spare us your lies about others being dishonest in the midst of your relentless rank dishonesty..

Evolution does not involve luck no matter how often you repeat this lie. It also remain an established and accepted scientist fact. I think the hilarity of you talking about embarrassment here is palpable, but again if you wish to delude yourself crack on.

Link to the Natural History Museum website,, it would be a good place to start, but of course you're not interested in the facts.

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/spotlight-owl-butterfly.html

You're the one denying a scientific fact, lying about what others have posted, and using ad hominem, as you have done here again. The posts you are responding to were not ad hominem, they were quotes of generic derogation about superstitions, and the behaviours of those who hold them in relentlessly trying to justify ignorance and stupidity, as you have done throughout this thread. It's a comment on content. Unlike this:

J N Vanderbilt III "Shows how weak and gullible you are,"

Which is pure ad hominem.

Another irony overload from you. As for gullibility, it's you who believes in magic apples and talking snakes, and magic from an unevidenced deity. Indeed it is you who is cherry picking a scientific facts you won't accept because it refutes the vapid creation myth in the bible. It's risible for anyone who believes that the puerile nonsense of creationism is true, to decry those who accept scientific facts as gullible.

Another belly laugh you've provided, so thanks.

Evolution does involve luck, the mutations are simply random, and natural selection is not, it is relentless. Luck is just your idiotic lie you keep repeating. As always no one is fooled. As for preposterous your vapid creationist myth is the very definition of preposterous, as is your denial of an objective scientific fact.

Shows how much you know little child.

It is NOT a pot plant. It is a Bonsai of a Japanese Maple Tree.

And if you find me annoying, you are not ignoring me.

It is so sad seeing such a young child growing up without a proper education...

rmfr

EDIT: fixed misspelling