Can you really be this obtuse by accident? You claimed "to be Atheist is to believe in one’s own Self", and of course it is not. Atheism is just the lack of belief in a deity or deities. This does not mean that an atheist cannot believe in their self. Your command of English is execrable if you think those two assertions are mutually exclusive.

"You cannot be an Atheist, because “you” do not exist."

Christ you don't half talk nonsense. You are conflating atheism with claims that have nothing to do with atheism. That aside there is objective evidence that I exist, and that I have a functioning human brain, and that this produces thoughts, as you have been told before and dishonestly ignored, and are now ignoring again. There is no objective evidence for any of yous asinine claims for anything supernatural being required, or involved.

The brain exists, and thoughts exist only where there is a material functioning brain. Paradoxically no one can demonstrate any objective evidence for anything supernatural, and in every instance where a human brain dies the thoughts associated with that person cease. What's more neurologists can map brain activity and we have objective evidence that when the brain is damaged different functions are impaired depending on which part of the brain is damaged and depending on how badly damaged.

Again I ask, and will keep asking, apart form argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy you jave used from the start, what OBJECTIVE evidence can you demonstrate for your bizarre claim that human thoughts are caused by an external supernatural cause? What objective evidence can you demonstrate for that supernatural deity anyway?

The answer as we have see again and again is nothing, you have nada, your claims are the worst kind of vapid fallacious nonsense. Your relentless strident and dismissive posts won't change this.

Argumentum ad ignorantiam means an argument from ignorance. It is negative evidence. It is a logical fallacy that provides that a statement is true only because it has not been proven false, or a statement is false only because it is not proven true.

That's called deflection, you're obfuscating.

@ rat spit

Really dude? I ain't clicking that link.

rmfr

From the man who claimed there were no such thing as objective facts.

@ Tin-Man

C'mon dude. Quit bragging about how you are so much better at typing than I am. Sheez.

***tree slowly shambles back to forest with boughs hung low***

rmfr

Yeah, I like ol' Rat Spit. He's good for morale around here.... *chuckle*... I rather enjoy his type of humor.