False, fabricated and unsubstantiated claims against Islam

98 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ramo Mpq's picture
Attempt number 8

Attempt number 8

If Islam is so bad, why aren’t all these “atrocities” that the lazy, ignorant and arrogant haters here bring up ever brought up by Scientists and scholars in a professional and educated debate against a Muslim scholar?

Sheldon's picture
https://youtu.be/Uj8J62BqRMo

https://youtu.be/Uj8J62BqRMo

7 times. Here are some of the questions you've been asked and have ignored:

Searching for truth, any chance you will answer any questions?

What is the punishment for apostasy in Islam?

What is the punishment for gay people who have sex with members of their own gender, according to Islam?

Is it ever morally acceptable to have sex with a 9 year old child?

Why should anyone care what the trolling muslim wants when he won't answer any questions ever.

Sapporo's picture
Searching for truth: Attempt

Searching for truth: Attempt number 8

If Islam is so bad, why aren’t all these “atrocities” that the lazy, ignorant and arrogant haters here bring up ever brought up by Scientists and scholars in a professional and educated debate against a Muslim scholar?

Your hypothesis is not valid, therefore it is false.

For a hypothesis to be legitimate, it should be clear, precise, and falsifiable. Your failure is entirely of your own creation. I would suggest that you do not determine what is true based purely on what you wish to be true.

You resorting to ad hominems and failing to offer evidence does not help your argument.

Ramo Mpq's picture
@Nyaarlthotep

@Nyaarlthotep

Is that really your justification? lol you think something will happen so it keeps you from doing something. Sounds like fear to me but, do as you wish.

Nyarlathotep's picture
Searching for truth - Is that

Searching for truth - Is that really your justification? lol you think something will happen so it keeps you from doing something. Sounds like fear to me but, do as you wish.

I can't tell what that is a response too.

Sapporo's picture
@Searching for truth

@Searching for truth

Have you stopped beating your wives?

Sapporo's picture
Searching for truth: @Sapporo

Searching for truth: @Sapporo

“You are asking us to prove your subjective label "lazy, ignorant, arrogant haters" wrong, even though it is subjective,” Aww, is that what is hurting your feelings? A few words got your ability to understand the main message of a question all messed up? I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you know exactly what my question means and how it’s intended. But, again, typical Atheist, simply trying to muddy the waters in an effort to avoid reaching an answer he won’t like and that will ultimately prove his hate and doubt towards Islam are simply false and unjustified.

You were talking about only having an issue with some atheists, now you are saying in a disparaging fashion I am acting like a typical atheist. I am glad that the typical Muslim is not like Muhammad at least. Please try not to allow your pathological hatred of those who think differently to you get in your way of producing a hypothesis that is clear, precise, and falsifiable.

Searching for truth: Take Sapporo for example, if he decided to actually be genuine he could simply bring up any of the "atrocities" or practices he think are wrong and present them. Yet, he choose to dance around and avoid providing an answer.

I have already done so, repeatedly. Notably the engaging in and condoning of torture.

watchman's picture
@Searching for truth....

@Searching for truth....

So ...you present no "atrocities"......non...not one... nothing ……. zero...… zip...… zilch… I give you an open goal..... a chance at a free shot ….. but you bring nothing then to discuss..... you present nothing but an assertion …

In response to your question.... I offer …..

"Christopher Hitchens — ‘That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.’

This I would suggest is why such subjects are not debated..... especially if Moslems are as reticent as you appear to be.

Ramo Mpq's picture
@sapporo

@sapporo

"Have you stopped beating your wives?" LOL what?

Sapporo's picture
@Searching for truth:

@Searching for truth: @sapporo

"Have you stopped beating your wives?" LOL what?

Your hypothesis is loaded.

Also, when a person produces a hypothesis, however sound, there isn't actually any onus on others to prove or disprove it. If you think you can, please feel free to do so.

Sapporo's picture
Can the OP explain how the

Can the OP explain how the concept of morality can be discussed in a scientific fashion?

Can the OP explain how a person critiquing an ideology they consider immoral can be considered "professional and educated" by fundamentalists of that ideology, and not "lazy, ignorant and arrogant"?

Can the OP explain how they would ensure that they would not simply label anybody who disagreed with their concept of morality and immorality as "lazy, ignorant and arrogant"?

Can the OP make an honest attempt at answering these questions without resorting to ad hominems?

Ramo Mpq's picture
@Sapporo,

@Sapporo,

Ok buddy, let’s start over. Seems we got off to wrong start. Let me try rephrasing my questions. Let me start off by apologizing for my “the lazy, ignorant and arrogant haters” comment. Bad way to start a conversation.

You said “I do not believe that Muslims should be tortured for believing that I should be tortured” you also mentioned torture a few times in the last few days. So let’s focus on torture for now.

It would be safe to assume you believe that Muslims should torture Atheists or anyone not a Muslim. Based off your statement above, can you please point to a Scientist or Scholar (of any religion) to bring that point up and debate it with a Muslim scholar? If yes, can you please post the link to the entire debate? Just to ensure nothing you cite is taken out of context.
Respectfully, I am not interested in your personal opinion, interpretation or copy pasting anything to justify your statement. The point here is to see what people that have spent a considerable amount of years of their lives studying theology and/or science have to say about this subject. I do not know you and you do not know me so, I think it’s best we refer to experts on this or these fields.

Sapporo's picture
Searching for truth: You said

Searching for truth: You said “I do not believe that Muslims should be tortured for believing that I should be tortured” you also mentioned torture a few times in the last few days. So let’s focus on torture for now.

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement." - quran 5:33

Crucifixion is recognized under the United Nations Convention against Torture as torture. Crucifixion is torture in any context - and yet Islam says it is justified for Muslims to engage in it.

Can you tell me whether or not you consider me as waging war against Allah by saying that Islam is an immoral ideology?

"Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses - We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise." - quran 4:56-

'Someone asked, "O Allah's Apostle This (ordinary) fire would have been sufficient (to torture the unbelievers)," Allah's Apostle said, "The (Hell) Fire has 69 parts more than the ordinary (worldly) fire, each part is as hot as this (worldly) fire."' - Sahih Bukhari 54:487

Tormenting a being in a fire is torture as recognized under the United Nations Convention against Torture. In any context, tormenting a being in a fire is torture. And yet Islam endorses the torture of most people who have ever lived.

Ramo Mpq's picture
I will answer any and of all

I will answer any and of all your questions after you have answered mine in the manner i have asked

Sapporo's picture
When a person produces a

When a person produces a hypothesis, however sound, there isn't actually any onus on others to prove or disprove it. If you think you can, please feel free to do so.

Your hypothesis is not valid, therefore it is false.

For a hypothesis to be legitimate, it should be clear, precise, and falsifiable. Your failure is entirely of your own creation. I would suggest that you do not determine what is true based purely on what you wish to be true.

Can the OP explain how the concept of morality can be discussed in a scientific fashion?

Can the OP explain how a person critiquing an ideology they consider immoral can be considered "professional and educated" by fundamentalists of that ideology, and not "lazy, ignorant and arrogant"?

Can the OP explain how they would ensure that they would not simply label anybody who disagreed with their concept of morality and immorality as "lazy, ignorant and arrogant"?

Can the OP make an honest attempt at answering these questions without resorting to ad hominems?

Ramo Mpq's picture
Oh, also anyone and everyone

Oh, also anyone and everyone who wants to answer the questions above is welcomed as well.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@ SfT

@ SfT

So who sets the rules here? Oh, of course you do....well in the words of the immortal...fuck off with your rules of debate. You don't answer questions, you ignore replies especially when accurate and on point. You avoid direct answers when confronted with Islamic scholars decisions on torture and punishments...basically you are a fucking pious fraud.
There will come a time when you will recognise yourself for what you are a: "wee cow'ring timorous beastie" trying to roar through a megaphone.
Because people actually answer you instead of an agenda driven presuppositionalism and insulting OP you get all huffy and pretend superior.
People here including myself have read and understood that pile of excrement you call the Qu'ran, I certainly have discussed the laws and traditions of Islam with scholars and holy men of the various sects and traditions of Islam. It is an appalling, medieval travesty of a life choice. To have your "religion of peace" you have to do what most moslems do...ignore at least half the damn book and either one or another set of Hadith. Which is precisely what you are doing , and have admitted to.

In short your have been intellectually dishonest, that's not a problem when dealing with us ( we have Breezy as a shining example), but you are dishonest with yourself. And that way will hurt you immeasurably.

And to answer your OP? who gives a flying fuck about scientist vs happy clappy fairy story researchers? Cant find a youtube or vimeo that suits you,well thats just fucking sad. Maybe any scientist with a brain cant be fucked t waste their time on bullshit from the 7th century. FFS man. get a life.

Cognostic's picture
Old man shouts ... FINALLY

Old man shouts ... FINALLY A VOICE OF REASON! "Maybe any scientist with a brain cant be fucked t waste their time on bullshit from the 7th century. FFS man. get a life."

I have no idea what took you so long to get here. I was there after his first page of responses.

The very kind atheists on this forum have addressed all of your questions clearly and accurately. The fact that you are blinded by faith and unable to read the English language has little to do with the wealth of very good information you have been given.

It hurts our little hearts to see you wallowing in such ignorance when it is totally unnecessary. But you know what they say.... "Good things grow from shit." We will keep hoping for you.

Sheldon's picture
You haven't answered any

You haven't answered any questions since you came here, so this fairly hypocritical even by the standard of your posts thus far, which is saying something.

Ramo Mpq's picture
@old man

@old man

“Maybe any scientist with a brain cant be fucked t waste their time on bullshit from the 7th century” I would expect a statement like that from a monkey but, I thought you were smarter. So based off your statement Lawrence Kraus does NOT have a brain since he debated Hamza tzortzis.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@ SfT

@ SfT

First you can shove your patronising "I thought you were smarter" up your clacker and fuck right off with it.

I was hoping you were smarter than to follow so slavishly this 7th century con trick. It is bullshit. It is a nasty, old man serving, misogynistic, cruel, hateful and a despicable religion. No better than the worst excesses of Catholicism or Calvinism. You have proved your ability to lie, ignore and gloss over the truth about Islam when you have been confronted by it and blindly repeated "a) we haven't read the qu'ran, or b) We haven't understood the Qu'ran or c) that's not what the book says, read the whole thing. Even when the fucking turgid shite has been directly quoted to you. Every. Single. Ignorant .Repetitive. Fucking. Time.

You're not debating, you are not searching, you are looking for confirmation of your sad life choices...you watched hundreds of hours of Youtube videos before you converted? For fucks sake, don't that say it all?....a youtube moslem. FFS. Facile, ignorant and lacking in basic life skills you are prime meat for any recruiter.

The thing is, you seem quite bright, with a great sense of humor, just sadly, very fucking stupid.

arakish's picture
***giant tree stands tall***

***giant tree stands tall***

Rah! Rah! Old Man Shouts At Clouds! He's our man! Rah! Rah!

rmfr

P.S. — Still looking for that 10K Agree button...

Ramo Mpq's picture
@sapporo

@sapporo

“When a person produces a hypothesis, …” I was not providing a hypothesis I was simply asking a question. But, go ahead and keep muddying the waters with your “Atheist dance” in an effort to avoid answering the question. My question is very straight forward.

Ramo Mpq's picture
Attempt number 9 – rephrased

Attempt number 9 – rephrased version of the original question

If Islam is so bad, why aren’t all the bad things that the Atheists here bring up ever brought up by Scientists and scholars in a professional and educated debate against a Muslim scholar?

Alpha's picture
Guys , he is not yet prepared

Guys , he is not yet prepared to see the truth.
I was as illogical as him in debating when i was 15 years old.Childish as shit!
He says because muslim apologists studied Quran and hadith only them have the right to debate and discuss.The reason is obvious , Islam has death penalty for those who left Islam and want to spread the word,SINCE Islam is the ultimate truth and all other religions are false and all other ways of life are wrong!
Muslims can’t doubt too much.Muslims can’t doubt fundamentals.They practice to believe and not doubt from childhood.They practice to be god-fearing.Fear = no question!
It is similar to slavery,Science loves discussion and hates prejudice.You can do and repeat mistakes as many times as you want! A religion’s slave can’t have disagreements.He must remain a slave his whole life! One mistake and he is gallowed or beheaded!

Cognostic's picture
Searching for truth: Is
arakish's picture
As Sheldon answered seven or

As Sheldon answered seven or eight times...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj8J62BqRMo

rmfr

Cognostic's picture
Yea ---- As "SHELDON"

Yea ---- As "SHELDON" answered "8 TIMES."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj8J62BqRMo

Friggen Islam and the dirty deeds of Mooohammad are being discussed all over the internet. BY Scholars. Toss a Quaran in the air and when it lands its likely to hit a Scholar on his arse as he is bent over with his head in the sand. (Hey! Just like you!) You are a Muslim! I take it back. You are not an atheist just trolling us. I just realized you really might be a Muslim.

Ramo Mpq's picture
@ Arakish,

@ Arakish,

I have mentioned in diferent threads that i no longer read anything Sheldon says. Long story short, he's simply not worth the time. Talnyearth mentioned the video you posted. I asked what the point was and how it answers my questions.

Also, i am not sure what your video is supposed to answer either. The video you and the monkey posted is not a debate. It's someone speaking freely. My question specifically said in a debate.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.