Categorically repudiating every line of a person's post is fatiguing to read, and can render a conversation redundant to some followers. A rambling post can overly-expand the conversation, drift from the main argument, and end in a non-conclusion; potency and impact are lost, and the main point risks becoming moot.
It's possible to succinctly summarize the main points, offer rebuttal - with supporting evidence - and conclude. Additionally, utilize breaks in text: during breaks, the reader can grasp arguments/concepts as differentiating from one another, and fit them into an overall statement.
So: In short...
That was a pun. : )
Hah!
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
