Everything that has life, contains intelligence, if not through a brain, through DNA, which is the encoded instruction written into the genes of living organisms. Therefore, if life exists, intelligence must exist also. Intelligence-driven information must already be in place for a single duplicate to be made. That intelligence-driven information is the genetic code of the being. The genetic code is as complex as a book, something that I have never seen write itself.

Though most life must consume life to survive, making a point in itself, even if the first lifeform fed off of only sunlight, it must have operated like a factory to perform photosynthesis, the process by which life turns sunlight into energy by which to function, as we are all little machines/energy producers; and the details of photosynthesis are written into the encoded genetic information that we have been talking about.

But even to say that if all of this came together in the perfect way by chance, why does it start functioning? If I were to take all of the cells of a human heart individually, and bring them together perfectly so that they create the perfect human heart, should I expect it to beat?

Life is a force that has always found a way to survive through multiple extinction level events. It has an intent and a natural driving force that causes it to keep on trying to live. Am I to believe that as the atoms and molecules came together in the perfect way to form RNA, the same way the cells functioned in the human heart example that was just demonstrated, that the ambition to sustain one's own existence is something that naturally occurs when certain things come together randomly.

Put through the atheistic funnel this makes no sense. There was a first life, which was created from nothing, or rather, the chemicals that composed the primordial soup. Any way you put it scientifically, there must be some reverse of the second law of thermodynamics/miracle in order for the current reality that we live in to exist. Such an event would undoubtedly require knowledge.

I would argue that it could be considered an atheistic argument to say that we do not truly exist at all, and this is all some kind of nonphysical thought of another organism or something, because the natural way of things is to fall apart, not come together; but when you look at the vast amount of automated and perfectly harmonious cycles and processes that atheists contend happened randomly and by chance, atheism just looks to me like the true delusion.

But if I’m wrong, tell me why and we can go from there.