I find that theists like to play philosophical games when it comes to "God" rather then simply provide evidence. To me it seems that is all they have. They will construct flawed logical arguments which lack verifiable evidence, and then claim it is proof.
I find this quite annoying actually. They construct silly arguments like there must be a god due to morality and such, or a first causer whithout any evidence such a thing must be a god much less their god.
The "evidences" I have heard for god all seem like philosophical masturbation rather then evidence which is what I would actually like.
Thoughts appreciated.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
