Death is proof that God exists

39 posts / 0 new
Last post
Tin-Man's picture
Welcome, Far Canal. Normally

Welcome, Far Canal. Normally I would tell the new folks to jump on in and not be shy, but it looks like that will not be necessary in your case.... *chuckle*... Good to have you with us.

@Arakish Re: "...Tin-Man sinks..."

Okay, listen. As I have already explained to you before, that was a one-time fluke. I was in a rush and totally forgot to install my drain plug. Plus, I now have a special compartment where I keep my Donald Duck arm floaties, so they are with me constantly.

Cognostic's picture
Strong Beliefs: What in the

Strong Beliefs: What in the fuck are you talking about. You come on here and assert a bunch of inane nonsense and then because people question what the hell kind of drugs you are on, We have Strong Beliefs? Do you even have a clue on how to pose a logical argument?

LIST OF INANE ASSERTIONS:
1. Humans are limited (according to what criteria?) (Nothing CLEAR about it unless you define what you are talking about.)

2. A truly good being would have ultimate power. (The Christian God has ultimate power and he is a murdering asshole. What are you talking about? )

3. Good and right are superior to evil and wrong. (Not until you define your terms. Just another inane comment.)

4. Good has never vanquished evil. Deluded religious idiots are one of the most evil forces on the planet today.

5, The reason humans have an end is because they are not good. (What is your evidence? And on a personal note - Go fuck yourself.

6. Killing evil is like cooking a meal. And creating an effective analogy is like trying to get through the third grade. Some people can do it and some people can't.

Calilasseia's picture
Oh dear.

Oh dear.

Let's take a look at this shall we?

Reading through the comments, this is certainly a land of atheists. People with strong beliefs, that’s fine

What part of "we dispense with "belief" altogether" do you not understand?

Treating manifestly unsupported supernaturalist assertions as unsupported assertions isn't a "belief". Do learn this elementary concept before continuing.

If we’re being frank here, would a truly good being ever have a filthy rotten corpse?

Once it dies, yes. Here's a clue for you. Death is nothing more than the cessation of the chemical reactions keeping us alive. Once this happens, other, still living organisms treat what's left as food. Many of these will grind to a halt in the same manner in the future.

Just because you happen not to like the prospect, doesn't mean that an imaginary magic man exists.

Humans are clearly limited and can only do so much. A truly good being would have ultimate power and ability; not limited in any way.

Ah, another unsupported blind assertion. Why would this be the case? Hint: you have a lot of work simply addressing the matter of definitions here, even before you go to work on the assertion itself.

Considering power and ability, which is superior? Right or wrong? Good or evil? According to how things in existence work, good and right are superior to evil and wrong.

I suspect those people who found themselves in gas chambers in 1943 might have something to say on this.

Humans have an end because they’re not good.

No, they have an end because of chemistry. The moment certain chemical reactions stop, it's game over, regardless of one's ethical track record.

Meanwhile, I have something substantive to attend to, so the rest of this waffle will simply be discarded.

Calilasseia's picture
Meanwhile, in the interests

Meanwhile, in the interests of providing some substantive content in this thread, I'll expand a little on the known links between certain biomolecules, ageing and death.

Oxygen is a vital respiratory gas for a large number of multicellular eukaryote species (of which we are one). Quite simply, if a human being is deprived of oxygen, death follows in pretty short order. Indeed, the toxicity of cyanide is due to a process of chemical asphyxiation, brought about by the binding of cyanide ions to haemoglobin, producing a stable compound that is no longer able to engage in oxygen transport. Once oxygen transport to tissues via haemoglobin is shut down, death occurs in a matter of minutes.

But, despite the vital nature of oxygen for our life processes, there's a dark side to this essential molecule. Oxygen's vital role in eukaryote metabolism, hinges upon its reactivity. Its reactivity with glucose, mediated by ATP, provides the energy for organisms to continue living, as this reaction is exothermic, and liberates spare bond energy that can be used further along the metabolic chain, so to speak. However, that reactivity is not selective: the same oxygen molecules that react with glucose, and provide us with useful energy for the rest of our life processes, will also react with other molecules - many other molecules. This includes molecules whose structure and stability are important contributors to cellular life processes - disrupt those molecules, and cellular life processes start to become compromised. Oxygen will readily form a number of reactive species in vivo, including damaging superoxide ions, hydroxy radicals, and other, similar chemical species that are disruptive to metabolic processes if not controlled. In short, the oxygen you need to live, is slowly killing you at the same time - a useful lesson in toxicology.

Needless to say, living organisms have, over evolutionary time, acquired ways and means of reducing the damage wrought by reactive oxygen species, in the form of various antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and various catalases. Although control of reactive oxygen species is not, by any means, the only factor that has an impact upon longevity, it has been established to be a significant contributor by various lines of experimental work. For example, there exists a gene in Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies (and, for that matter a whole raft of other organisms) which, because of its effects upon longevity, has been named methuselah (biologists have long been renowned for a certain whimsical sense of humour when naming genes), usually shortened in the literature to mth.

It transpires that there exist mth mutant strains of D. melanogaster, which exhibit an extended life span compared to that of non-mutant flies. These long lived flies not only exhibit an extended life span, but also exhibit increased resistance to oxidative, heat and starvation stresses. In particular, mth mutant files exhibit enhanced resistance to the effects of paraquat, a compound used as a herbicide that is also toxic to animals. The toxicity of paraquat to animals, arises from the fact that this compound generates large quantities of reactive oxygen species in vivo, overwhelming the antioxidant defences of animal cells, and leading via this process to rapidly lethal disruption of vital mitochondrial function. However, whilst D. melanogaster individuals with a 'normal' genotype succumb quickly to paraquat poisoning, mth mutant flies exhibit considerably enhanced resistance to paraquat, by virtue of the operation of the mutant mth gene. The mutant mth gene results in the production of a protein that possesses its own, additionally enhanced capacity for removing reactive oxygen species from the cytoplasm, but also upregulates the production of other antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, resulting in mth mutant flies producing a much more abundant army of antioxidants to control wayward reactive oxygen species. This results in reduced oxidative damage to critical metabolic pathways, and as a corollary, an enhanced lifespan.

It's worth noting that homologues of mth, and variations in the genes coding for SOD and catalases, are frequently correlated with lifespan. Organisms with relatively inefficient variations on the theme tend to be short lived, whilst long-lived organisms have more efficient variations. This is not the whole story with respect to longevity, of course, but the insights from biochemistry and molecular biology in this vein are worth noting.

A long dissertation on the subject of the mth gene and its mutations can be found here. It transpires that another useful by-product of mth involves modified and beneficial (from a longevity standpoint) integration with insulin signalling. For a full exposition of the state of knowledge of this subject, one is invited to track down the 21 scientific paper references at the end of that article.

I could cover, in a similar vein, how other molecules that are considered vital nutrients, such as glucose, also have a dark side. Those like myself, who have to deal with type 2 diabetes, become aware of this dark side in an immediately manifest visceral manner. The same glucose molecules you need to power your body, will over time reveal their dark side, through such means as their long term implication in atherosclerosis, for example. Similarly, triglycerides (the chemical family to which fats belong) have their own woes associated with them, and cholesterol, which is of such ubiquitous metabolic utility that our bodies synthesise it, will also reveal its propensity for chemical mischief over time given the opportunity.

In short, with life, comes death, and it comes precisely because of the varied nature of the chemical reactions we rely upon to live.

LogicFTW's picture
Thanks for that write up, I

Thanks for that write up, I learned a lot.

LostLocke's picture
And this got me thinking, to

And this got me thinking, to tie in to the OP....

He states, that a truly good being can never die, or their bodies become corrupt, as per his "rotten corpse" statement.
A lack of oxygen can kill you in minutes, and normal oxygen usage can kill or damage you over a longer time period. Since this is the case, a "truly good" being could never be an oxygen breather. Since humans were "created" to breathe oxygen, that would imply that this god created us knowing it was impossible for us to EVER be good by any means. So, "God" intentionally created a race of beings that could only be bad, be corrupt, and eventually die.
In my book that makes this god cruel and malicious.

dogalmighty's picture
You can believe in whatever

You can believe in whatever you want, trolls, fairies, gods or dragons...you can even throw in a talking donkey or two for good measure if you want...but don't forget that is your personal delusion, and the second you reveal it to others, you open yourself to ridicule...You are a moron, living a wishful fantasy, in a fool's paradise, derived from self deception and stupidity. Wilful ignorance is the cornerstone of faith.

The simple fact that you have proven you can't differentiate supernatural things from reality, tells me that you can not defend any of your assertions...which makes debate with you silly and pointless.

toto974's picture
"which makes debate with you

"which makes debate with you silly and pointless.". There is so much of these lately.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.