Argument from Motion

182 posts / 0 new
Last post
Chris McDearman's picture
Argument from Motion

1. Our senses prove that some things are in motion.

2. Things move when potential motion becomes actual motion.

3. Only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion.

4. Nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect (i.e., if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another).

5. Therefore nothing can move itself.

6. Therefore each thing in motion is moved by something else.

7. The sequence of motion cannot extend ad infinitum.

8. Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

Nyarlathotep's picture
Well if we ignore the serious
Chris McDearman's picture
The sequence of motion cannot
Nyarlathotep's picture
Who told you it was a
Chris McDearman's picture
No one told me it was
Nyarlathotep's picture
Got to love it when the arm
Chris McDearman's picture
You can't expect to be taken
Nyarlathotep's picture
No, it was in reference to
Chris McDearman's picture
So what have we been doing
mykcob4's picture
Yet another failed line of
Chris McDearman's picture
"The glaring facts that this
mykcob4's picture
@ Radical. The argument doesn
Chris McDearman's picture
I didn't say everything must
mykcob4's picture
I have explained this in
Chris McDearman's picture
You haven't given any depth.
mykcob4's picture
@Radiacl
MCDennis's picture
Oh bullshit. You wrote:
Chris McDearman's picture
Every other god? I didn't
MCDennis's picture
You couldn't argue your way
Chris McDearman's picture
So that's your brillian
MCDennis's picture
Troll alert
Chris McDearman's picture
Are you serious?
chimp3's picture
Radicalwhiggery: I am
Chris McDearman's picture
Thank you. I do find it odd
Nyarlathotep's picture
Have to agree with you there.
curtisabass's picture
I know I dissed you before on
Dave Matson's picture
RadicalWhiggery:
Chris McDearman's picture
I agree that Aquinas didn't
Dave Matson's picture
I don't see that you have
Dave Matson's picture
RadicalWhiggery:
Chris McDearman's picture
So nothing started them

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.