Appreciate it!
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
Anyway to get a dislike button as well?
Agree / Disagree and Like / Dislike. Not a bad idea.
Wish someone would add a Dislike-button on Facebook...
Nice idea cyber
I don't think a dislike button helps for debate.
The like or dislike is for statistical purposes usually.
Debating is best expressed not voted.
Besides a dislike button would increase my chances of missing some of CyberLN's epic combacks or Jeff yelling "that's bs."
Whenever I click on "Agree" it switches to "Disagree" and updates the total. I mean, I'm all about one-click arguing, so this is an awesome feature! Now Ellie's comment above has a "Disagree (1)" from my perspective. Curious, but now when I try to agree, I come across sounding disagreeable.
I have the same issue....
Yes it's good option and feel like facebook style but I believe it may be misused by people who not believe in someone's view and may create problems.
It has been misused already, by people who do not care what is written but who wrote it.
I can't get the AGREE button to work. When I click it, the only option I get is Disagree. Maybe it's because I am using a Chrome browser?
If you see "Disagree", it means you have already agreed with that post and you can remove that "Agree" vote by clicking on "Disagree". Strange, it's perfectly clear in my brain, but then it looks odd when I write it down. Anyway, Seeing "Disagree" is good. Everyone else sees that the post has been agreed with.
Hello cmallen. I did not have an option to agree with your post. When I clicked on the "Agree" box, all I got was a "Disagree" option. From my perspective, I have clicked "Disagree" to your post, because that is the only option available to me. I was not presented with an "Agree" option. Perhaps everyone else sees that the post has been agreed with, but that is not what the button says I did.
Weird, it works for me. I clicked agree on your post and now it says "Disagree 1", which says to me that I have agreed and I an the only one who has agreed. If someone else alsobagrees it will say " Disagree 2, Disagree 3, etc." Maybe its something with you guys' browser settings or something else 'techie' like that.
Thanks for the disagree button!
Yea it makes more sens now
Yea it makes more sens now
Well, actually...
Now I can't see if I already have agreed or not. So I end up removing my agree, then clicking to put it back.
A suggestion: Make the agree button green or something if the user has agreed. Perhaps red for the disagree button.
Pragmatic is right. There are 2 "unexpected behaviors"
If you have already clicked agree in the past:
1) if you click agree again, it removes your agree. This might be desirable so as to have a way to remove agree votes you have changed your mind about, but it is confusing (Pragmatic offered a good solution for this).
2) Even weirder: if you click disagree, it adds a disagree vote, but does not remove your previous agree vote. So right now it is possible to cast 2 votes, 1 for agree, and 1 for disagree on the same post.
Now we need a third vote button: a "thinks poster is Kenny" button.
An other thing I noticed that happened after the dislike button was added, is that now you can agree and disagree with your own posts.
Kenny might abuse this feature :P
We use a subset of CBCL dataset which is composed of 100 face images and 100 non-face images. Each image has been resized to a ROI of 19 by 19 pixels. We select 75 images from each group to train a classifier and determine the most salient features. The remaining 25 images from each class are used to assess the performance of the classifier. https://damnxstories.blogspot.com/search/label/girlfriend%20sex%20stories A random forest classifier can be trained in order to select the most salient features, specifically for face classification. The idea is to determine which features are most often used by the ensemble of trees. By using only the most salient features in subsequent steps, we can drastically speed up the computation while retaining accuracy.
Those were wise words, but from what I have observed, most organizations don’t heed them when tackling innovation projects. Indeed, when developing new products, processes, or even businesses, most companies aren’t sufficiently rigorous in defining the problems they’re attempting to solve and articulating why those issues are important. Without that rigor, organizations miss opportunities, waste resources, and end up pursuing innovation initiatives that aren’t aligned with their strategies. How many times have you seen a project go down one path only to realize in hindsight that it should have gone down another? How many times have you seen an innovation program deliver a seemingly breakthrough result only to find that it can’t be implemented or it https://readxxxstories.blogspot.com/2021/03/landlord-sex-mone.html
https://readxxxstories.blogspot.com/2021/03/college-girl-sex.html addresses the wrong problem? Many organizations need to become better at asking the right questions so that they tackle the right problems.
What do you say "And up pursuing innovation initiatives that aren’t aligned with their strategies. How many times have you seen a project go down one path only to realize in hindsight that it should have gone down another? How many times have you seen an innovation https://damnxstories.blogspot.com/2022/01/hot-office-girl-sex-after-phot... https://damnxstories.blogspot.com/2022/01/hard-erection-made-friends-gir...