you atheists say "there is no logical reason to believe in God".
OK, well, what is the logical reason to believe in no God?

Another major problem I have with you atheists is essentially you say "we can explain how the universe came into existence, therefore there MUST be no creator."

That's like saying, " I can explain how this computer was made therefore nobody could have made it".

That doesn't quite logically follow.

Another point I'd like to make as a creationist, I DO NOT DENY ANY SCIENTIFIC PROOF OR REASONING!!!!
You see atheism is the lack of belief in a deity, due to as you say 'a lack of scientific evidence'. However a good counter argument is as follows.

Can science detect anything outside the laws of physics? NO
Therefore can we use science as a means of 'detecting God'? NO

So why use science of a means of 'detecting' God?
It is logical to use examples of how God exists using scientific examples, by NO MEANS is this 'detecting' God , just using scientific examples to show how xyz shows that this couldn't have created itself or occurred by itself etc therefore God must have did it.

Now now, before you anti-creationist, quote on quote "rationalists" are quick to jump into the 'God of the gaps' argument please, what you're doing there is irrationally saying that "no no lets leave God out, that can't be an answer... it's just not possible". That's very irrational.