Jack,

Yep, you got us. I'm on my knees now begging forgiveness for my arrogance.

Here's a few gems from AIG:

"Either the rock record is the evidence of millions of years, or it is largely the evidence of Noah’s Flood"

"The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for its youth. And that’s what we find in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy."

There are too many others, equally laughable, to print.

For a concise debunking of all this nonsense, www.talkorigins.org.

I am not clicking the link. I will however, listen to your, or whoever's best argument, written in text.

I am entirely tired of theistic drive by, shit and run, posts.

If you can formulate a sentence, or even cut and paste...do so. Otherwise go shit post somewhere else.

I will though, ask you to present anything that has been validated, without objective evidence.

@Validity: The quality of being logically or factually sound; soundness or cogency.
"one might question the validity of our data"

SOUNDNESS: The quality of being based on valid reason or good judgment.

There is no "Soundness" or "Good Reason" offered in the collective texts of the bible. Anything that may seem reasonable in one book or one chapter is directly contradicted in another. The Book is a collection of 27 tribal Iron Age texts (Referencing The New Testament Only, Which directly contradicts the Old Testament) and these texts are written at different times, in different places, and for different audiences. Jesus himself, the topic of discussion in the texts, appears with completely different personalities in different texts. There is no consistency throughout any of the books and certainly no validity or soundness. NONE.

@ JACKSON5
From your OP it is supposed that when you die and go to your expected judgment before your god you will have a relevant Microsoft Powerpoint presentation ready by the lake of fire, so that God won't think you are a goat. Do not offer him a url link.

Just to show you how discussion and debate works here on AR I offer the following rebuttal on a single item in your generous copy'n'paste of a url which you offer as a claim to the depth, width and strength of your faith in your glorious god who must be really impressed with your witness to his ineffable glory...a website reference...*sigh

Isaiah 7:14 is one of the most Christian abused verses of the Old Testament.
Isaiah 7:14 was the prophecy meant for King Azah of Judah (c. 730 BC), a prediction Isaiah made about his deliverance from the rival kingdoms of Syria and Israel through their invasion by Assyria.
There is no direct reference to a baby being born 700 years later. The baby referred to is to be named "Emmanuel" which means "God is with us", a most comforting idea for a king in fear of an invasion.
In fact only several verses later, Isaiah 8:3 Isaiah has sex with his wife "the prophetess" with witnesses (kinky)and before the son born of this union "shall have knowledge to cry" (good and bad) Assyria will take care of Ahaz's foes.
The boy was named Maher-shalah-hash-baz, "swift are the spoils, speedy is the plunder" which adequately describes the short sharp plunder of Assyrian forces in the state of Israel and in Syria.
And in case you overlooked it "Jesus" is never mentioned.
And in the end Isaiah's prophecy did not guarantee a complete deliverance. Ahaz became a vassal of Assryria, paying tribute to avoid annihilation. It seems the deliverance was achieved by going "belly up".

This verse is also the origin of the fatuous virgin myth where almah (a maiden) was translated as betulah (a virgin). The original Hebrew text used the word "almah".

Now Jackson5, I have taken time out of my day to read, consider and answer your OP or rather Mr Ham's Answers in Genesis article. Your glib and easy url reference contains a multitude of claims, you apparently can't be arsed enough to discuss or debate yourself. Click and paste witnessing just doesn't reveal what you believe or think, only what Mr Ham does.
Because of time restraints and a sense of being insulted by your indifferent and casual brevity I answered, in my own words, only the one reference to the Isaiah prophecy. I did so with my own research and without resort to parroting predigested third party opinions. I researched the KJV Bible, the Orthodox Jewish Bible, the Webster and Macquarie dictionaries and summarised some observations from independent sites.
Do you think you might spend just a little time responding and preferably without another lame cut and paste effort?
Otherwise I am done.

edited because I am such a spelling Nazi..

@JACKSON5

Yale Divinity has launched a Free Public Bible Study. Professor Joel Baden was instrumental in implementing this project. Take the challenge. Are you smarter than an Ivy League Biblical Scholar?

https://youtu.be/NIXfDyoYK8Q

https://yalebiblestudy.org/

*Spoiler Alert* There is absolutely Nothing divine about the bible. It was written by unknown authors over the course of centuries. Most Ivy League biblical scholars state they do Not believe in Supernatural Jesus. Also, the devil isn't anymore real than the boogeyman. 666 stands for Caesar Nero not Satan.

@Jackson5

That's not evidence it's a link.

I've just checked all the major global news networks, this "evidence" isn't mentioned anywhere?

Anyone else find it odd this paradigm shifting discovery of evidence always breaks on here first? Then months later none of the atheist posters managed to see any evidence presented, despite the protestations by theists it's been presented?

Let's try putting that clapped out theist pony in front of their cart for once...

Please present the most compelling objective evidence you have for believing any deity is real?

He seems to turn up, preach to the heathens, then leave. Maybe he's struggling with the concept of debate, some theist do get very precious when their spiel is picked apart critically.