@atheistviolator

Chernobyl is an example of what happens under a totalitarian regime that puts ideology above science and truth and rejects any accountability to the victims of its cruel follies and excesses.

Does that remind you of anything?

@Grinseed

Some things I read about Michel de Nostredame . Now I don't remember where or when, so I might be wrong;

(1) He invented some spiffing recipes for jam, some which remain in use.

(2) At one time , he took all of his quatrains into one bundle and threw them into the air. He them put them back together in the order in which they landed. IE randomly. It has occurred to me that old Michel could have been pranking those who believe in prophesies.

(3) Today scholars seem to think that the prophecies of Nostradamus referred to eighteenth century France.

OT; Is our apparently illiterate newcomer meant to be a Christian ? From memory, Christianity and Judaism expressly forbid any form of fortune telling

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((9)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

From wikipedia:

"Most academic sources reject the notion that Nostradamus had any genuine supernatural prophetic abilities and maintain that the associations made between world events and Nostradamus's quatrains are the result of misinterpretations or mistranslations (sometimes deliberate).[8] These academics argue that Nostradamus's predictions are characteristically vague, meaning they could be applied to virtually anything, and are useless for determining whether their author had any real prophetic powers. They also point out that English translations of his quatrains are almost always of extremely poor quality, based on later manuscripts, produced by authors with little knowledge of sixteenth-century French, and often deliberately mistranslated to make the prophecies fit whatever events the translator believed they were supposed to have predicted. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostradamus

atheistviolator "WHEN APPARENTLY HARMLESS TESTS GO TRAGICALLY WRONG..."

It was not a harmless test, if you had even a cursory knowledge of the topic you'd known it was extremely reckless to the point of criminal negligence, that was bungled incompetence of the most breathtaking kind. There was also an inherent flaw in a major safety design of the USSR's nuclear stations that the testers were unaware of. Relating to the fuel rods being reinserted into the reactor core, and the accelerated reaction produced by the graphite coating on them. The testers had let the reactor almost stop, and then tried to bring the core reaction back up insanely quicker than was safe. You really ought to glean some facts before commenting on any topic, as your ignorance here is not only embarrassing, it manifestly shows you have no interest in facts or the truth.

It speaks volumes you'd rather vacuum up religious lies, rhetoric and propaganda from YouTube, than educate yourself with the most basic facts. This then is everything that is wrong with religion, and superstition, in that it instils a sense of false achievement in believers who deny facts in favour of their a priori belief. Your posts started as a joke, and very quickly became a cliche, all very sad, and yet oh so typical of theists who know next to nothing, yet think they possess absolute knowledge.

D’fuck, atheistviolater? Can you please be more succinct?

atheistviolator Hurts to have your delusions burst, eh?

How on earth would you know? And no, on the contrary if I am ever wrong about something I'd be thrilled to be corrected, as I'd have managed to learn something, you ought to try it, as your posts suggest very few people are so desperately in need of knowledge as you clearly are.

You even claim that the test on the Chernobyl plant was routine, when in fact it was beyond reckless in the way it was conducted, and the reactor design itself had an inherent flaw in one of its major safety designs, facts anyone can Google if they have any interest in learning the truth, and which you ignored in favour of dishonest religious rhetoric, and that speaks volumes about you, even without the rather puerile trolling.

@Calilasseia

Oh yeah, you were dead on. That user has been removed.

To be honest, I kind of dropped the ball. I recognized they were a previous banned user; but we often times allow those people a 2nd chance. But you reminded me of which exact person this was, and they will certainly not be getting a 2nd chance (as you know, they have a long history of making threats and other really nasty stuff).