At random times throughout my stay in the forum, I've encountered comments that left me thinking; comments which seem to only be half-baked. So, I would like to hear from those who have made such comments what the other half is.
By this I'm referring to the comments which try to falsify random things in Christian history. Comments which say Jesus never exist. Comments which say the gospels weren't written by the apostles. Comments which say the Bible wasn't the Bible until some council decided on it. As well as comments that many fundamental beliefs didn't appear until much later. Every single one of those types of comments, aims to destroy something fundamental in the church's history, without forwarding something in its place. It leaves an informational gap.
There's almost two billion Christians alive today, and most of recent history has danced intimately with the Christianity. So, what exactly is the proposed origins of Christianity, if most of the traditional view is considered fabricated, exaggerated, or nonexistent?
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
Pages