I'm not going to give any speech, all I see interesting to know is located here -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9e_vcSut0A
Those Americans who think this is stupid, mind your ignorance because U.S is not facing this crisis.
A little info on the guy:
He's a atheist, a advocate for secularism, free speech and democracy. Take note, if any of you asks the definition of "democracy" for this guy, Democracy isn't just a lilly-llaby let's-always-shake-hands-idea.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
I didn't make it very far into the video. I turned it off when he started endorsing unilineal evolution.
Well you think not? Is not Western culture superior to that of the Middle Eastern one? Is that the fallacy you believe in? Calling a culture superior to another is not racism or xenophobia, it's a realistic fact, the reason that so many Countries around the world have adapted to the Democratic system, doesn't that show a clear fact?
While I don't agree with your conclusions, you have done a great job of putting your finger on the key issue with that question. Let me rephrase it slightly: "Is culture A superior to culture B"? How could we answer that question? One method (1) would be to pick some property of cultures and measure this property of culture A and culture B and compare the measurements (for the sake of argument, I'll assume such a thing is possible).
You might notice all 3 methods are objective, in that everyone who agrees to use the method (with your table) will get the same result. But the choice of the details of any given method is highly subjective.
---------------------------------
So because of what I laid out above, I'm extremely skeptical of your statement that it is a fact that culture A can be superior to culture B; as I see no way in which it could be anything other than an opinion.
I do see now, for as much as I can understand. My head is a boiling pot right now, too many news on crimes committed by refugees is frying my neurons.
I would suggest trying to find data to compare the crime rates of refugees with crime rates of "long time residents" with similar economic status (I guessing that refugees are rather poor). But sadly I'm guessing this data might not exist; and I'm definitely not willing to guess what the result would be.
Damn Nyarlathotep that was so well explained. Cultures can't be valued by their wealth alone but so many other thing contribute to a successful society.
This English man is a real asshole. He reminds me of Alex jones from info wars.
I have a wealthy Swedish client. She vacations with her family on their own island. She was talking about how she didn't want to forget anything because no grocery stores on their island. I recently asked about the terror in Sweden because of trumps comments.
First, she said rape is calculated differently in Sweden. If a husband rapes his wife 365 days a year then she reports it each rape is counted as a separate incident. Makes for a very high statistic.
She also said Swedish people need immigrants and have always welcomed them, because with out them their life styles would change completely.
As for the rapists in Europe I was concerned until I found out that in multiple cases the victims wouldn't receive a rape kit test and later took back their storeies or changed them.FAKE NEWS! The newspaper that ran the story apologized for false info.
She's wealthy, of course she doesn't have to deal with it.
Why on earth would we welcome in a bunch if terrorists, call them "refugees" and let them run around raping everybody? Thats just stupid.
Harry Truman, we should welcome them because they are not a bunch of rapists but families and children.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-waterston/refugees-international-givin...
It takes almost 2 years for a Syrian refugee to be vetted to come to the United States. If they can finally escape the horrors they faced in their homes they will enter America having been checked by every agency possible and we will more info on them than most of us Americans.
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
That's why 80% of them are military aged men who support Sharia Law?
Bullshit alarm going off on that one!
The problem may not necessarily be with the refugee parents but with their refugee children who will grow up in the foreign countries. They are the ones who usually resort to crime and terrorism. It's stupid to flood a country with people who may be insane from coping with decades of war and destruction in their homelands.