Interestingly, maybe the beginning of our universe was not the beginning of time.

https://www.sciencealert.com/mind-bending-study-suggests-time-did-actual...

So it cannot be stated that time had a beginning.... at least in respect to our universe.

@ SergiG: Why do you insist on using the "CRAPPIEST" of arguments against religious claims. Every page of the bible is an archaeological discovery.

ARCHEOLOGICAL PROOF A BODY IN THE FIRST CENTURY COULD BE CRUCIFIED AND HAVE A BURRIAL: (JUST LIKE THE BIBLE SAYS).
a discovery in Giv’at ha-Mivtar, a Jewish neighbourhood in north-east Jerusalem, proves that a victim of crucifixion could receive a proper, honourable Jewish burial. The story begins in 1968 when building contractors unexpectedly uncovered an ancient burial site containing about 35 bodies.

One tomb contained the bones of two generations of a family who lived in the century before the time of Jesus. One member of that family was Yehohanan, who was between 24 and 28 years old when he died. He had been crucified. His bones were discovered in an 18-inch long limestone ossuary (or bone-box), and a seven-inch nail had been driven through the heel bone of his left foot.

THE VILLAGE OF NAZARETH
Archaeology has also added to this literary evidence. The evidence on the ground in Nazareth gives a good indication of the ancient date of the village. For example, archaeological digs in the vicinity of Nazareth have discovered tombs dating from the first century AD confirming the village was a strongly Jewish settlement. Then, in December 2009, archaeologists from the Israeli Antiquities Authority, excavating in the grounds of a former convent, unearthed a house from first century Nazareth. According to excavation director Yardenna Alexandre: “The discovery is of the utmost importance since it reveals for the very first time a house from the Jewish village of Nazareth and thereby sheds light on the way of life at the time of Jesus. The building that we found is small and modest and it is most likely typical of the dwellings in Nazareth in that period.”

Were I to go on and on and on there are hundreds if not thousands of archaeological findings that support the stories of the Bible. Basing a refutation of Jesus, God or the Bible on the supposed lack of archaeology is FUCKING STUPID. Especially if you are not an archaeologist whose specialty is first century Greek and Roman archaeology. You sound as stupid as the Creationists. All you are doing is making one inane assertion after another. Any intelligent theist would make you look like a moron.

You do not get support on this site, even if you are an atheist, for bad arguments and inane assertions. Please read a frigging book and think about the things you say.,