I challenge anyone to prove that prayer works.
I contend that it is just another form of enslaving the masses into obedience.
I contend that prayer is actually destructive. It causes people to believe in a fantasy and not properly address the problem at hand. It creates false hope.
First of all, as someone that was raised and taught in the king's church or the Church of England, I know that people are using prayer incorrectly
.
According to the bible, one cannot pray to ask for things, they shall not be granted.
James 4:3 says not to pray for things
English Standard Version
"You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions".
You shouldn't pray just to be seen.
Mathew 6.5 says not to pay in public.
English Standard Version
“And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward."
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
Prayer is like masturbation. Feels good but does not do much for the person your thinking about.
God is all powerful and all knowing.. God knows what he will do and what you have asked for, so if he does or does not do something it is all apart of his plan.. Now say someone claims a prayer is responded too, all you have to do is locate a life, a human suffering more than you, why did god not respond to his/her prayer? Can he not or is he evil?
That was assuming god exsists.
Let me leave you with a thought : "If you were god, what would you do first? What all problems would you fix?... Now realize you pray to a god that does not do those things.."
These are those moments where I wish there were theists on the board making contributions.
The problem with telling someone that prayer is invective lies in the fact that there is God and Satan. If their prayer is "answered," God listened. If their prayer was not "answered," Satan intervened or it was God's will. This logic allows individuals to pick and choose the effectiveness of prayer.
Prayer also works as a way for an individual to feel that they have contributed something to the problem. "Oh you have cancer? Let me pray for you."
I agree that prayer does not work, but it does create a sort of placebo for those that do pray.
I appreciate that you (mykckob4) quote the bible for your argument.
This should cure what ails you.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Prayer#Study_of_the_Therapeutic_Effects_of_...
With the current devotion to the phrase "In God we Trust", when you think about it, if one did trust God then prayer would be
mooted. Why try to either persuade God to do things differently, as you see circumstances, or, on the other hand, convince
God that you honored him if you did Trust God.
Perhaps it can work, depending on what you pray to...
http://kotaku.com/elderly-woman-mistakenly-prays-to-league-of-legends-ch...
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
Well, my wife would challenge your claim but she's convinced her prayers are heard. Whatever.
While not exactly prayers, I can tell you that native American dream catchers and rain dances certainly didn't work. All it got them was heaping helpings of genocide. When you act primitive, you invite criticism and worse. It's a dangerous life to be of a pagan belief system in the presence of a genuine, card carrying religion like christianity.
A prayer works like gift-giving. The return on investment is selfish in nature. It's a feel good thing. There's where people could technically win that side of the argument. If it makes them feel good then there's actually something good and very real that comes from it. Maybe it won't cure a family member of cancer but the act itself promotes fulfillment. People who pray often feel good about themselves often. They, in turn, promote the act and hence we have religion as the by-product of selling that kind of joy. People take joy wherever they can get it even if they're not wholly convinced of the prayer angle. In the case of religions, they embrace the pageantry because the tug of the hope of joy is strong.
Personally, I find much more fulfillment from cursing. I always have. It let's out the toxins, so to speak, where prayer is like putting a bandage on the stump of a severed limb.
It's always nice when people say they've been praying for me
I hope you are being sarcastic. When people are saying that they are praying for you, it is to be condescending and superior. That you are below them, beneath them. According to the bible the only thing that one CAN pray for is to understand god's word and the strength to obey that word. Christians don't know what the hell they are talking about when they say that they will or are praying for you.
The muslims get prayer wrong also. They pray to praise god(allah). This is the fundamental perversion of the religion of the tribes of abraham. The jews get it wrong also as they pray for forgiveness.
If you understand the fundamental religion of the tribes of abraham you understand that.
1) You pray to understand the word of god and the strength(ability) to obey that word.
2) You don't pray in groups or publicly or to impress others.
3) You don't pray for things or others.
4) You don't pray to praise god (patronize).
5) You don't pray for forgiveness because god doesn't forgive(jewish/islam) only jesus forgives(christian).
Prayer is bullshit anyway. It is a tactic to command obedience, to enslave the masses.
The fact of the matter is, I get more love and kindness from the Christians than any other group. Everyone else either doesnt care or just wants to prove themselves right.
LOL Just ROLLING ON THE FLOOR Laughing. ROFL
I wanna save this for a laugh later:
To show you why I am Laughing:
Vincent Paul Tran:
"Jeff, I don't have a system of right and wrong, or any belief system for that matter. Just and unjust I don't care. Right and not right I do not care. I'm more concerned with the overall functionality of this forum and the satisfaction of the users."
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/forums/site-support/officially-reporting-...
Then....
"The fact of the matter is, I get more love and kindness from the Christians than any other group. Everyone else either doesn't care or just wants to prove themselves right."
LOL, you first say do no not care what is JUST, and now you say that Christians show more love because you think the rest do not care.
When I was caring for the satisfaction of the forum from the persecution(Trolling) behavior of Nyarlathotep against me and every single theist arguments(instead of actually debating), you simply did not care.
Before I thought you might be a psychopath with no feelings, now I realized you might just be a hypocrite that dares to accuse "any other group" (including all atheists) as showing less "love and kindness".
LOL The hypocrisy is just unbelievable. You do take the word hypocrisy to a whole new level man.
I wonder if your are doing it on purpose?
Some other points of merit on the hypocrisy.
Vincent Paul Tran
"I don't think N. is a troll, Jeff. I think he is just trolling YOU. You do make it easy.................."
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/forums/site-support/officially-reporting-...
So Trolling 1 person is not Trolling for Vincent Paul Tran?
Ahh yes it it called Trolling + Persecution to people he disagrees with.
I'm still laughing lol
I have reported you for conduct and unsolicited bullying. Please stop insulting people.
I'm not insulting him, I claimed he was being a hypocrite in that post and I supported my claim.
An insult is when something is not the truth.
He thinks that all people are less loving then the Christian group without supporting his claim while he doesn't care about justice or anything. At the same time he includes himself with "Everyone else either doesn't care".
I think he is being a hypocrite and I supported my claim.
It is my personal opinion which I am ready to defend with actual evidence.
Can you stop this aggressive behavior against me mykckob4 even when you agree with me?
I may agree with you but your attitude isn't civil nor is it productive. We all know that probably no persons mind will be changed on this forum...that is the nature of forums. It doesn't mean that we cannot be civil. I am not being "aggressive". I am just trying to get you to settle down and show some courtesy and civility. I agree that his post, are for lack of a better term..."hypocritical". I just think that he lacks sophistication. He hasn't for one reason or another been able to articulate a definitive position on any issue.....but he is trying.
I think that his post and his OP's are cries for communion. I think that he is lonely. I think that he is trying unsuccessfully to fit in. Some of these people are fragile and without direction.
No this forum is not a place to find comfort, but it shouldn't be a place to garner admonishment unless warranted.
I think that you are too quick to act mean and com-passionless. I actually think that you scan a post and then decide to go on an attack. In that I think that you miss the content somewhat.
Insults are not just lies, they can also be truths if they are delivered in a demeaning manner.
Everyone is a hypocrite....absolutely everyone. Everyone lies....absolutely everyone.
Trans problem is that he classifies people by groups and therefor demeans an entire group and defends an entire group. Christians can be loving and kind. Any group can. I'm sure Tran could find ISIS members that can be kind and loving in the right situation.
It is correct to identify certain groups for what they are but only when it is the groups institutional tenet for being that way. The KKK for example are all racist. That is their tenet.
When it comes to "groups" Tran's judgement is clearly naive. Maybe we could help him/her with that without insulting him.
"I may agree with you but your attitude isn't civil nor is it productive."
You mean you think that my "attitude isn't civil nor is it productive", right?
"We all know that probably no persons mind will be changed on this forum"
No we don't.
I can change my mind on any subject.
"that is the nature of forums, "
no it is not, the nature is to debate, and through debating we learn things.
"It doesn't mean that we cannot be civil. "
I am civil, I am civil enough to inform the people here that someone might pulling their leg.
"I am not being "aggressive".
You are, judging by all the things you accused me of, I think it is quite obvious.
When you think someone stepped over the line, you should respect every single person involved(including moderators) enough to at least ask for justification before reporting people.
Reporting people to get them banned is considered very aggressive.
" I am just trying to get you to settle down and show some courtesy and civility. "
I think that I would not be honest on my part to not to expose dishonest and hypocritical behavior for what it is.
It is not me being mean, I truly think that is a good thing to do.
"I think that his post and his OP's are cries for communion. I think that he is lonely. I think that he is trying unsuccessfully to fit in. Some of these people are fragile and without direction."
Man he said that he doesn't care about justice or good or bad.
I see nothing of what you just claimed in his posts.
"I think that you are too quick to act mean and com-passionless. I actually think that you scan a post and then decide to go on an attack."
No man, he excused himself from not accepting the obvious on a topic by saying that he does not care for what is just, good or bad.
As if that is even a position you could have in a civilized forum without being considered insane.
If an admin bans for no reason and someone complains, his reply would be; "on forums I do not care for justice."
Palm Facing when I read it to the point of not even replying.
I could not dignify him with a reply some 3 months ago or whenever he posted that bullshit.
Now he posts that caring comes more from christian groups.
Unbelievable hypocrisy.
"I think that you are too quick to act mean and com-passionless."
I disagree and you failed to support this accusation of yours.
I think I was nice enough to not even reply to his hideous proposition of not caring for justice.
Now he went a step too far some months later.
"Everyone is a hypocrite....absolutely everyone. Everyone lies....absolutely everyone."
You should speak for yourself, and even if you are right then that means that I was not insulting him at all.
Which makes you basically prove yourself wrong here.
"Trans problem is that he classifies people by groups"
He does stereo type but I did not say he was wrong or right in my reply.
"When it comes to "groups" Tran's judgement is clearly naive."
I disagree.
Actually I agree with him.
He most likely does see more kindness from the Christian groups then from others.
"I get more love and kindness from the Christians than any other group. "
He is talking about his experience and it would be arrogant to think he is wrong.
It is HIS experience.
(there are factors of location, etc... involved)
"Everyone else either doesn't care or just wants to prove themselves right."
I would agree that he sees it in that way.
But saying it in this manner is generalizing because it seems he is stating something as a fact rather then a personal experience.
and here I agree with you that:
"When it comes to "groups" Tran's judgement is clearly naive."
(On this part not on the first part)
"Maybe we could help him/her with that without insulting him."
We should indeed, in fact I did not insult him, I pointed the hypocritical behavior displayed in debating which puts a whole new picture to the story.
That he might not even think what he is claiming.
Simply unbelievable.
I don't think is truly the case. Christians aren't being kind for nothing. They always want something.
VPT - "The fact of the matter is, I get more love and kindness from the Christians than any other group."
That might be a fact based on geography. Most of the nice people I know are Christians. But most of the ass-holes I know are Christian as well. This is because most of the people I know are Christian, so they compose the largest block of almost any category I can think of.
The claims of offering up prayers is, to the religious, an attempt at gift giving. Don't read too much into it. They claim to pray, atheists dismiss such claims as part of theism's conditioning, and everything is normal. It is expected that the people say they pray. If they do or don't is no ones business to know. Problems start only when atheists, taking up an anti-theist stance, openly declare being in conflict with someone offering up prayers.
Tiresome. Let people have their claims on prayer-giving. It's not a problem to be atheist and, simultaneously, let others be themselves. That's what atheists do.
Anti-theists are the ones who get all full of themselves and take the religioso to test. They use their anti-theism acts no differently than a religioso uses theism. The anti-theist, therefore, makes just as much useless noise as a theist and, in doing so, sends into a tertiary orbit the art of living in harmony. They abandon the option for living peaceably to make war on a perceived enemy. Therefore, anti-theism is an exercise in stupidity despite its (perceived) claim on logic.
I have known and currently know many religiously indoctrinated people who will openly offer up prayer as another way of offering a gift. I don't have any friends (having worked diligently to keep myself free of such encumbrance) yet when a religiously-aligned person learns of my convictions it is a natural response mechanism to offer up a prayer for my salvation. He or she will "pray for me". Of course, people who now know me well will simply wish me luck rather then endure my oft-repeated provocative inquiries about their qualifications for blessing me, or praying for my almighty self, who I hold in higher esteem than their god or gods. They get my light hearted, blasphemous humor and instead wish me luck. That satisfies the intent to bless me and everyone is happy. That can be done in certain societies and I would be well advised to hold my tongue in less tolerant environments.
Christians are too confused about how they should or should not conduct themselves. You have to give them lot's of space and tolerance. Religion, especially the teaching in the christian writings they are taught from, are morally and ethically all over the place. In one passage it's okay to kill a wayward son, in another its fine to own slaves, in countless others the messages are conflicting within the Big Four Gospels themselves (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John), the Epistles and in the so called Prophecies. None of it can be proven, all of it is proven pseudepigrapha, and even the various titled positions of leadership (priests, ministers, padres, parsons, etc) will never read from the unsavory sections of that book. It's dying a slow death with each new revelation of truth. Give the christians a chance to die with as much dignity as their ignorance will allow. They have a lot to pray about these days.
"Anti-theists are the ones who get all full of themselves and take the religioso to test. They use their anti-theism acts no differently than a religioso uses theism. The anti-theist, therefore, makes just as much useless noise as a theist and, in doing so, sends into a tertiary orbit the art of living in harmony. They abandon the option for living peaceably to make war on a perceived enemy. Therefore, anti-theism is an exercise in stupidity despite its (perceived) claim on logic."
awc.. dam Pitar would not have thought you had such a bad understanding of what anti-theism means.
I understand that some anti-theists could do what you claimed and some do but clearly not an "an exercise in stupidity".
I am an anti-theists only for one reason, because I recognize the harm theism does to society and think we would be better without it.
That is all what an anti-theist is.
An Atheist makes no claims he just lacks belief in the theistic claims.
An Anti-Theist is a person who makes the claim that theism does more harm to humanity then good.
(anti-theistic concepts like gay-rights, anti-indoctrination, etc..)
"Christians are too confused about how they should or should not conduct themselves. You have to give them lot's of space and tolerance."
Yes that is true even for anti-theists.
"Give the Christians a chance to die with as much dignity as their ignorance will allow. They have a lot to pray about these days."
I think You are also an anti-theist :P
Most moral and informed atheist are also anti-theists.
I understand your stance and sure we should just let the people who say they will pray for you alone even though it is clearly them just being condescending. My OP asked if prayer actually does anything, if so what?
The management team of the business I work for likes to start each day with a prayer. I do not participate in the prayer or offer prayer requests. Recently they started drawing names out of a hat and sending "Prayer-Grams" to employees letting them know the team is praying for them. I always sign "Thinking of You". It is one way that I participate as a team member without committing identity suicide. I give the others credit for being concerned about each others well being. My opinion that prayer is like masturbation still stands.
It is against the law in the United States to subject you to that practice. It violates your individual right. Even if it is a private business.
Where is there a separation of church and private business clause in the constitution ?
Yea the theory is far different from the practice.
Too many loop holes and windows to pass from.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (commerce clause).
Article VI, The Establishment Clause, Although these constitutional laws deal mainly with the federal government dealing with religion, it is a legal framework for protecting individual religious freedom and belief. The Federalist Papers explain that all rights are individual and not majority, therefore your rights cannot be infringed upon even though you may be the minority. Federalist Papers No.'s 10 & 51 explains this.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/establishment_clause
http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/primary-source-docum...
http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/primary-source-docum...
Which was practically gutted by USC 42...RFRA.
Can you believe a Democrat actually got the ball rolling on that awful bill?
Clearly the bill is unconstitutional, but until it is challenged in court it stands.
Pages