I'm sure everyone has seen the "Creationist Bingo" cards, you can Google them if not and there's a similar "ID Creationist Bingo" card.
But I feel like they're kind of out dated now, and some of the arguments on them haven't been pulled out in years. How long has it been since any of you saw the polystrate trees argument? How about the 'only wet rock folds' argument? How about some attempt at using Mt Saint Helens? I remember when all of those were as common as "No transitional fossils" is now.
Most of the squares are still valid, AIG/ICR memes, 'no observed' evolution, quote mining people like Gould, fine tuning, trying to associate atheists and/or evolution with Nazism, ect ect.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
That sounds like fun!
Should be a laugh.
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
Some ideas for squares:
Some of these are adapted from here.
Too Funny - It makes me want to run out and create Atheist Bingo Cards.
B1 - Who does not believe in the polystrate trees argument? (Answer - Atheists)
B2 - Who does not believe in the only wet rock folds' argument? (Answer - Atheists)
B3 - Who does not believe in God? (Answer - Atheists)
B4 - Who believes man evolved from an ape like ancestor? (Evolutionists - If you said "atheists" your wrong, atheism does not address biology.)
B5 - Who believes the universe just created itself? (No one! If you said Atheists you are a moron because atheism has nothing to do with cosmology."
Okay... I need some help with the "I - N - G - 0s"
Well here's the old one.
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
Going row by row
I haven't seen irreducible complexity for a while, but it hasn't been so long that I think it's gotten out dated, and in spite of having it destroyed in front of them at Dover the Discovery Institute still tries to proclaim the validity of it. I also haven't seen Dinosaur Soft Tissue for a while, but again, it hasn't been that long. The other three are bread and butter that we see all the time, "Just a Theory" "Second Law of Thermodynamics" and "Hitler/Nazi" memes.
Irreducible complexity... HOUSE!
I must thank Breezy for this one really, as he so shamelessly plagiarises it so often.
I1 - Who does not believe in irreducible Complexity (Atheists - Wrong. Atheism does not address biology. Damn! We already told them that.
I1 - ??
The only one in the second row that might have to change is the Mt Saint Helens one, I've honestly never even seen that one ever. Has anyone else?
'Never Observed' 'Evolution is a religion' 'Fine tuned' 'No Transitional'
Seen all of these within the last week.
She's watching you.... She's watching you all!!!!!
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
If I get nightmares about her and that picture, I am blaming you RandomHero1982!
Well I will blame her too, but mostly you.
I'm afraid...... I'm very afraid. I am completely convinced that it was her interview with Richard Dawkins that caused his stroke. He simply walked away from the interview wondering "WTF was that." And it bothered him so much over the years that he actually had a stroke.
To be fair, I think I nearly had one too after watching the video... lol