When asking theists about evolution they always say micro yes macro no, yes we can observe micro and we can not observe macro but both fall into the theory of evolution, and 99.9% of scientists accept it.. Isnt macro just micro plus hell of alot more time and changes.. We have fossils showing missing links.. What can i say to better address my point to a theist, what argument should i used when confronted with "micro yes macro no"..
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
Pages