I think it is time to legalise sexual attraction to children and to accept love of children in America. Children have the right to be loved and do not have to be treated as people without voices. Children have a right to speak as much as adults and be heard. Children have the right to be loved by adults and adults have the right to love children and be loved by children.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
I think perhaps you are taking the Greek roots of the word too seriously.
yes i am taking the greek roots of the words very seriously. I love pedophilia.
@Anne
Okay yeah, you are trolling. The avatar picture you picked may trick some people, but it is clear to me now you are trolling.
hi logicFTW. I am not leaving intentionally annoying messages on the internet to get attention or cause trouble. I am trying hard to get people out of jail who are convicted pedophiles because they are 100% innocent. There is no sin and no cruelty whatsoever in pedophilia.
"Anne" is not even a female. Just some sick and twisted dude.
Wow. I saw this debate line about children and I still do not believe it is serious.
This reminds me of the thinking of many people who are demanding or suggesting that men should be able to enter the public restrooms of women
But - This is supposed to be a private, clean, sterile - controlled and safe environment for American daughters and wives, where fully grown men are never supposed to normally be allowed to enter into a room where they possibly place them in danger.
If a supermarket security camera attendant sees a grown man entering into a woman’s restroom and He is not supposed to go in there - The security personnel can go to the restroom and, ( for example ) make sure that an 11-year-old little girl is safe and get that man out - or see what is going on.
But if many multiple men are allowed to be using the women’s restrooms, lets say - within a six-hour period it makes Americans feel uncomfortable because there is no way to pinpoint who may have committed a sexual assault - because a handful of men could have been in the women's restroom when the rape or assault was committed. Men can work in groups or RAPE GANGS in order to protect another male who has committed an assault. And the rapist could also cover the little childs / girls’ mouth or knock her unconscious or drug her in the private stall and commit a number of rape activities - just by keeping her feet hidden and elevated above the viewpoint at the bottom of the stall.
it would be difficult if not impossible to have an early type of an early prevention procedure -
if many men are entering in and out of a woman’s restroom at a time it makes it unsafe and increases the great risk of potential rape and assault that can go on - and security cameras and security personnel can do little ( OR NOTHING } with security personnel monitoring them. - IF many males are expected to be allowed to be entering into the women's restroom.
Even if they install security cameras inside the restroom - the cameras are not always monitored and being watched in real time at every single minute of the day. They could even install cameras inside the private stalls where people do their bathroom business -- - BUT - There would be a greater risk with the multiple men being allowed to enter into the restroom.
At least, if there was a law that says that business has a right to prohibit men from using the women's restroom - any security camera tapes that could later be reviewed after a sexual assault or rape has happened - only the group of men or a couple of men or a single man could be suspects and they would know who to arrest or bring in for interrogation of legal questioning. If many, many men are entering and exiting the women's restroom within a given day - there could be a very high amount of a number of men to track down and suspect.
Many men could be arrested just because they were shopping and went into the unisex restroom and were seen on camera going in and out. They may never catch the rapist or assailant or know for sure who to arrest or suspect.
And the same goes for little girls and women entering into a men’s restroom. Men must be kept out of women's private areas - especially when rape is very common in the USA.
A woman and all little girls deserve the right to be respected - their restrooms need to be clean, sterile and safe. - - One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped at some point in their lives.
In the U.S., one in three women and one in six men experienced some form of contact sexual violence in their lifetime.
91% of victims of rape and sexual assault are female, and nine percent are male.
if there is so much rape that occurs every year in around the world and male Adults are raping and sexually assaulting other female adults - imagine the rape and assault that would occur once the men who are horrible, bad men and abusers find out that they can have sexual relations with a 12-year-old child.
The adult male rapist could simply say that the child asked them for sexual intercourse.
Also if pedophilia became legal - then that means that 13 and 14-year-old little girls can begin having sex with other 13 and 14-year-old little boys - imagine the pre-teen pregnancy that would explode across the country. Millions of children at the age of 14 would be getting pregnant. This is very dangerous. Millions of Children would be infected with aids, STDs, diseases, and cancers. Their minds are not fully developed - they are still developing physically and mentally - and they are old enough to make rational responsible decisions.
This is total perversity and the breakdown of society - many people support the breakdown of society and the destruction of moral standards because they have a selective moral code.
Liberal Socialism is their only code or moral standard. - CREATING ViCTIMS - is all that revolves around their world. While Republican Conservatives want to at least try to stop VICTIMHOOD and expect responsibility and for people to be held accountable for their own actions - in a free market, capitalist society - where those who make decisions on a MORAL STANDARD that ensures that they succeed - because they choose to live by a moral standard that is safe sex, waiting to have sex, working hard and saving money and being financially responsible. If everyone was to pay for the sexual adventures, sexual joys, sexual journeys and SEXUAL PLEASURES of others - the whole world would be a third world Liberal Socialist and Communist world of poverty and a total breakdown.
We can look and see the Liberal Socialist Democrat Cities here in America and South Of The Border and see that is very clear. People who have morals, have responsibility and save their money and wait to have sex - should have the right to save the money and earnings that they have worked and sacrificed for - instead of living like animals fighting over a rotten piece of meat fallen by the wayside.
I read everything you wrote and I totally understand what you wrote. I agree that no one wants to catch any STDs or vaginal cancer. Cool. I love paedophilia still and wish it to be legalised still because the concept of paedophilia is child love or sexual attraction to children and it is totally a natural thing. It's like banning people from ever talking when talking is a natural thing. No one can be harmed by someone being sexually attracted to them but they can be harmed by contracting an STD or vaginal cancer. So the solution is condoms. I see nothing wrong with men and boys using condoms during sexual intercourse to avoid catching and transmitting STDs and vaginal cancer.
@landlore
Going to try to keep this short but you brought up a lot of points I would like to discuss.
Have not heard of very many cases of "people" demanding men should be able to enter women's public restrooms. Unless you mean (and I think this is likely what you really mean,) Male (born with xy chromosome and has "male" sexual organs at birth,) to female transgender women being allowed to choose the restroom they associate with. Please correct me if I am wrong but I am going to assume that is what you really mean in the rest of my responses.
Never heard of a public bathroom male or female that was private clean and sterile. Private bathrooms sure, but a public one? I avoid going number 2 at those bathrooms at all costs. I even use "all gender" bathrooms over the mens if available simply because they are rarely used and are typically much cleaner. IDGAF the looks people give me when I step in or out of those bathrooms.
I seen fully grown men enter womens restrooms all the time, the janitors that clean them. They call out and put up a little sign. I assume you do not mean to block those people. Do these janitors have special privileges because of their job? Are they trustworthy over a random man stepping into a woman's bathroom?
And the security camera agent watched the little girl go into the bathroom first? Do you honestly expect every public bathroom in america to have security cameras that are actively watched? You do realize this is impossible right? Any argument around active monitoring of who goes in and out of bathrooms is ridiculous.
Yes there is, there is many ways they can pinpoint who commited the sexual assault. Also there already many many robust laws that protects anyone, anywhere from rape. It is not like public bathrooms are a suddenly "lawless" place where law no longer applies, public bathrooms are already protected by laws to help protect anyone that uses them.
The rest of your paragraph is a highly hypothetical concept that has nothing to do with bathrooms, other then yes, that is one place a rape could occur. (Why do people think this place is so vulnerable over other places? Is it because people actually take off some clothes around their private area in there and their is stalls that offer some privacy while they do this (but not much!) I doubt any girl getting raped in a bathroom would have it go unnoticed by everyone else that happened to be in the bathroom at the same time. Sure maybe they can knock them unconscious, and yes people that rape can be really stupid, but bathrooms if they are at all intelligent is not going to be their first choice. Additionally rape is not rare, rape in a public bathroom by a stranger however is very rare.
Unfortunately all to true, and a new, demeaning and ultimately redundant and unnecessary law is not going to change this.
And you do realize active monitoring of the entrances to all public restrooms is a pipe dream right? I shave my beard throw on a wig and some female clothes is someone watching a live stream of public bathroom entrance via camera all day is going to notice I am not a female? How about if you are going to force everyone to use the restroom (impossible to enforce anyways) how about the transgender men (women to male) I seen plenty of them that have huge biceps, full grown beards, are they supposed to go into the women's bathroom? If you do not know what I mean, google "do you really want me in the women's bathroom" for images of these female to male transgenders, trust me you would think it was a guy, (and possibly a scary looking one at that) that was in your little girls bathroom.
Yeah that is just ridiculous, would you ever use a public bathroom that has cameras in the stall? Would you let your little daughter use such a bathroom? How do you find reasonable "normal" trustworthy people to watch dozens of cameras all day of people doing their bathroom business?
Stepping away from your ridiculous "cameras in each stall" idea it may be somewhat practical and worthwhile goal to setup cameras where possible at entrances to bathrooms to track the coming and goings that can be reviewed after a rape occured. (or an assault, or burlgarly etc) Cameras and storage is getting increasingly cheap, this may actually be feasible for many public restrooms. And may already be underway at many public restrooms in public areas.
And women are automatically given a free pass? Only men can commit crimes or rape?
Again, camera evidence is very useful, but not perfect (especially since it wont see them doing the act, only place them at the scene of the crime.) There are many other avenues to catching people, especially rape (dna evidence, rape kits etc) If you want to reduce rapes I would recommend you petition your local congressman to help fund more money into rape kits, currently it is 6-30 weeks (depending on area) backlog on rape kit processing, with many rape kits never getting processed.
Rape is sadly very common throughout the entire world. There has even been some study that the more religious a society is the more rape that occurs.
Agreed (duh) and if anything the statistics you presented may be underrepresented. Also know while men commit rape a lot more than women, men that get raped are much more likely to not report it. (Just like many women do not report rape but men are even less likely to report it.) So your final statistic, while it may be true, it is likely a lot more men get raped then what the statistics show.
Mostly agree with this paragraph.
Lost me here, looks like some sort of weird rant. Seems like you have a lot of fear of "liberal socialism" and want to tie a lot of ills to it. Fortunately there is little to no "liberal socialism" in the US and few people interested in doing that. (Even Bernie Sanders is not a liberal socialist like you describe.)
You are really starting to fall off here, did your meds run out? There is no liberal socialist democrat cities in the US. Not even San Diego could be described as liberal socialist city. Liberal sure, but there is not anything close to socialism happening there.
Uh... yeah you are still going off into the deep end here, perhaps talk to a psychiatrist for some meds? Of course people have a right to freedom happiness and prosperity, I have not heard of any group of any size in the USA trying to advocate different. Where did this "animals fighting over rotten piece of meat" come from a talk about bathrooms? Do you really believe if a few male-to-female women use the female bathroom we will devolve to animals fighting over rotten meat? Is it possible for you to see how crazy your own words sound?
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▮ I am an atheist that always likes a good debate. ▮
▮ Please include @LogicFTW in responses directed to me. ▮
▮ Useful list on forum usage. A.R. Member since 2016. ▮
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
@landlore
"But if many multiple men are allowed to be using the women’s restrooms, lets say - within a six-hour period it makes Americans feel uncomfortable because there is no way to pinpoint who may have committed a sexual assault - because a handful of men could have been in the women's restroom when the rape or assault was committed. Men can work in groups or RAPE GANGS in order to protect another male who has committed an assault. And the rapist could also cover the little childs / girls’ mouth or knock her unconscious or drug her in the private stall and commit a number of rape activities - just by keeping her feet hidden and elevated above the viewpoint at the bottom of the stall."
Wow, just wow. Landlore, you seem to have really thought it through. In fact, the detail of planning is what one who plans to commit such a heinous act would do.
I am the type or person who thinks things through and does a lot of planning. For example, yesterday I purchased an item at a store. I checked out the best price and customer service available at different stores, and also watched two different YouTube videos about the product I was planning to purchase. And it was basically just a twenty dollar item.
But I have never thought about or planned child rape to the degree you have devoted.
There is something very very wrong about you.
Hey, Mods, do we really have to endure the disturbingly nauseating garbage this Anne troll is spewing? Getting rather pathetic, to say the least.
@Tin-Man:
I agree. This "Anne" troll is beyond disgusting.
Hi Algebe. This is a very nice site. It allows free speech which is beautiful.
Yep. Troll
rmfr
Attachments
Attach Image/Video?:
Lots of points here.
Anne's viewpoints are not too different from those expressed by others.
Victorian age of consent was around 12 I think - Some cultures it is the start of menarch. Very few think this is a good thing. Most agree it only results in trauma.
Some of the pedophiles caught, priest or otherwise agree. Some have stated that having sex with children didn't violate vows of celibacy.
I was just reading a post this morning that compared teen pregnancy to education & income rates & that often teen pregnancy is a desperate teenager being sexually abused and looking for a life line out of a dangerous situation. The baby is supposed to be the magic means of escape.
Women's bathrooms are usually cleaner.
Some people are BORN gender neutral and they have to go SOMEWHERE. One of my cousin, the nurse's first patients in the 1950's midwest was a women who had been told at birth she was a man, but the internal organs didn't match.
The ADA code will have to adjust. - Many ADA bathrooms are already one person only.
When I went to Italy in the late 80's early 90's, a lot of bathrooms were unisex. I remember the stalls were separate.
thanks Mrs Owczarek. I totally agree with the Victorians that 12 year olds can enjoy sex. But I go further to agree that younger kids can fantasize about sex too. I had a sex fantasy between the ages of 5 and 7 years old and one of the girls in my primary school pulled down her pants in front of a group of boys in my school. Cute x
@Anne
"I think it is time to legalise sexual attraction to children and to accept love of children in America. Children have the right to be loved and do not have to be treated as people without voices. Children have a right to speak as much as adults and be heard. Children have the right to be loved by adults and adults have the right to love children and be loved by children."
NO NO NO NO NO
This is a wicked and sick thing that requires the full force of the law and extreme incarceration against anyone so sick and evil.
Children are not allowed to vote because they are not mentally capable of thinking responsibly. They are also innocent and easily manipulated.
NO NO NO NO NO
Anne, your post and position makes my physically ill. And angry.
Anne, to quote Hari Seldon, "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
I am not one to commit violence against anyone. But I just passed the information from this thread to these good people.
http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/sexcrimes/ces.php
I do not bluff. I did it.
Anne is locked and I'm locking the other pedophile thread.