Who has ever claimed the universe came about purely by chance? Chance certainly may have played a part, but you're lying and changing this to purely by chance, which I have never heard anyone claim. Evolution explain the origins of species, it's a biological theory, but has nothing to do with the origins of life, or the origins of the universe. You'd have to be woefully ignorant to not know such basic facts.

"your statistics showing how everything came to be by pure chance, etc."

Who on earth are you talking to / about? I have never heard this claimed except in as a straw man argument by disingenuous religious apologists.
--------------------------------------
"Nothing can change my worldview and my faith I have in Jesus Christ."

Then you're closed minded and discussion is pointless. So one wonders why you'd come to a debate forum?
----------------------------------------
"The faith you possess to believe how processes like evolution and the Big Bang actually occurred matches the faith I have that my God created everything in existence."

Evolution and the big bang theory are based only on empirical evidence, as is all science. Faith plays no part in science's methods.
---------------------------------
"Unless you can construct a time machine and go back to the "very beginning", your faith in scientific explanations will be no different from my faith in Biblical interpretations."

You're talking complete rubbish I'm afraid, and really should educate yourself on the scientific methods, and how it goes about evidences claims, before enough evidence is validated for an explanation of a natural phenomena to become established within science as a scientific theory. Religions can demonstrate nothing approaching scientific evidence, indeed I've not seen anyone demonstrate any objective evidence for a deity or anything supernatural.
--------------------------------
"So explain to me how you'll be 100% confident in the formation of the universe once you board a time machine and travel back to the beginning."

You do love to make up straw man arguments don't you, don't you realise how this makes you and your beliefs look when you're so dishonest? Science's confidence it is claims comes from the methods used to scrutinise them critically, and the fact that all the evidence validates them and in terms of scientific theories like evolution the fact that after 150+ years of intense scrutiny it remains true and more well evidenced every year. Like all scientific facts it also remains tentative, as science is a method for gathering knowledge and seeking the truth, it would be as useless as religion is at validating claims if it could not correct an error, whether small or large. Though it's absurd to speculate that something as well evidenced as evolution is likely to be reversed, as that's about as likely as the earth suddenly be discovered to be flat all along. I have never heard a scientists claim to be 100% certain about anything, quite the contrary they are extremely guarded in their claims. Only theists make absolute claims in my experience.

Go away and learn a little about science and it's methods, as using these cliched straw men arguments just makes you embarrass yourself.

And from the nose-bleed section: *cheers and hurahs and claps* for posts not made by Paul Pores.

I am going to repeat what Algebe pointed out. It was also the first thing I wanted to ask.

Paul Pores:
"Nothing can change my worldview and my faith I have in Jesus Christ."

Then why did you post in the "Debate Room"

rmfr

P.S.- Gads, this sucks having to post while in the hospital...

@Paul Pores
If you need faith in order to believe in god, why are you asking god to show truth to others?