Aahahahhaha seriously? The one paragraph insertion into Josephus has long been considered a poor fraud, similarly with *Tacitus which is an 11th century copy of a Second Century manuscript ( we do not know how accurately copied after ONE THOUSAND YEARS) or are you throwing away all those years of study by Theological scholars and basing your assertions on misguided "faith?"

*"No original manuscripts of the Annals exist and the surviving copies of Tacitus' works derive from two principal manuscripts, known as the Medicean manuscripts, written in Latin, which are held in the Laurentian Library in Florence, Italy. It is the second Medicean manuscript, 11th century and from the Benedictine abbey at Monte Cassino, which is the oldest surviving copy of the passage describing Christians. Scholars generally agree that these copies were written at Monte Cassino and the end of the document refers to Abbas Raynaldus who was most probably one of the two abbots of that name at the abbey during that period."

Note; Tacitus describes Christians and their faith not any evidence for the existence of such a person as Jesus or the Christ. He blames them for the great fire of Rome ( 30 years after the supposed death of Jesus). Here is the key passage translated (courtesy of Wikepedia, I doubt you could cope with my original study on this)
" Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind".

Have you heard of basic research?

Note the phrase: " And a most mischievious superstition"
The Christus reference is telling, I will leave that to you to look up.
You might want to look up when Pilate was actually in Judeae, makes interesting reading being as you want to rely on Roman records.

Your evidence relies on a fake one para entry and a hand copied document one thousand years after the events describing the christians as utterly mistaken? Seriously? Oh gotta love an enthusiast JoC..."None so blind that will not see."
Please don't come back with Polycarp or the Rylands fragment I have already demolished those furphys in discussion with your fellow fantasist AB.

There is no corroborating evidence extant for such a Messiah figure. Do you not think the OCD Roman bureaucrats would have missed writing about hundreds of Jewish zombies on the streets of Jerusalem, the day turning to night? The disruption of the Jewish day of Passover? All at the crucifixion of the leader of an (not so popular) uprising? Please JoC, use some intelligence and critical thinking here. The Romans were obsessive about recording events and logistics even the most minor things!

There is no corroborating evidence of the time that describes Jesus's existence and death. None.
.