"science in this case does you no good because you are totally relying on nonsense luck,"

Species evolution does not involve luck, and is a scientifically accepted fact. I challenge you to cite a single peer reviewed publication that claims luck is involved? So if you genuinely believe that claim then explain why evolution has remained an accepted scientific fact for over 160 years supported by all the scientific evidence?

Also why does the largest and oldest christian church, the RCC accept it as a fact? They have virtually limitless resources to challenge it and find evidence that falsifies it after all? Come to that why does evolution bother you so much? Is it because you have no evidence for creationism?

How did your god zap a human into existence using clay and magic, with a talking snake and magic apples?

Again I invite you to cite a single peer reviewed or scientifically validated piece of research or evidence citing luck plays any part of species evolution. You're talking nonsense and you know it.

PMLMAO.

Any explanation how you claim your magic sky fairy created a talking snake and magic apples, or zapped a human instantly into existence with clay yet?

Tic toc, anyone would think you have no explanation...ho hum

You don't understand natural selection, or species evolution.Not even a basic grasp of the definitions.

J N Vanderbilt III "So you finally admitted mutations are random."

I have stated this from the very start, you really are the mother and father of all liars, even for a creatard. Here's a post stating it from 4 days ago, and another from 7 days ago. You're not christian at all are you?

Sun, 01/06/2019 - 12:18 Sheldon "A mutation is a change in a gene or chromosome. **Mutations arise spontaneously** and happen continually. A mutation rarely creates a new phenotype, but if the phenotype is suited to a particular environment, it can lead to rapid change in a species."

Thu, 01/03/2019 - 23:36
Sheldon "There's no luck involved, only **random mutations."

http://www.atheistrepublic.com/forums/debate-room/has-nature-ever-create...

You also still haven't explained how your deity created a talking snake and magic apples?

You haven't explained either why you claimed sequences ARE codes, and yet they clearly are not?

Nor have you told us if you accept the objective scientific fact that the universe over 13 billion years old?

You're a coward who avoids answering any questions, and a liar who misrepresents what others have posted, and of course lie continuously that evolution involves luck, but when asked to cite a single peer reviewed piece of scientific evidence that claims luck is involved you run away like the all cowardly lying creationists.

One wonders what you hope to gain by lying to people who unlike you know better?

@ Arakish

Well, I tried to help JNV3 by giving him links to what I thought were simple videos outlining the basics of evolution. Sadly they were too intellectually challenging for him. Short of an arrangement of wooden bricks (as if for toddlers) I can't think of any other way to get the educational point across.

JNV3's "ideas" are culled (Plagiarised) from second rate preachers and fourth rate apologists. Not one original argument or idea has he posted on this forum. Like many creatards who cling to the one discredited idea, if we demolish/discredit it (which we all have) then they are left adrift in the harsh sea of reality with no rescue except that much despised lifeboat the "Education".

JNV3's OP and subsequent histrionics have resulted in everything posted being thoroughly and comprehensively debunked. We are now reduced to watching JNV3 endlessly repeating a single erroneous phrase while Sheldon patiently points out lies, inaccuracies and falsifications. Nothing has been learnt from the creatard side and nothing educational has been absorbed by the propounder of the creationist foolishness. .

When I write 'nothing" I should immediately correct myself by saying what has been learnt by any observer is the character of JNV3. The lack of morality and ethical behaviour is reflected in the casual mendacity of many posts, the attempts to redefine common words, and the brazen 'shifting of goalposts' when utterly debunked. It is not a pretty, or edifying spectacle.

I should imagine any wavering theist could be utterly repelled by the brash and ignorant arguments presented here on the creationist side. What a teacher involved in the education of the OP must feel.......

There is no explanation for a mythical bronze age deity used magic to create humans from clay in an instant, because it is an unevidenced and risible superstition. That's why ot has no explanatory power whatsoever.

Check mate, with or without species evolution your creation myth is an empty bag, a naked emperor yoou're pretending has clothes by looking the other way, anywhere where you can pretend it stands up to any scrutiny. Hence your deflection in attacking sciennce.

How many scientific facts do you deny that don't in any way refute any part of your religious beliefs?

It's none isn't it, PMLMAO.

You are funny...

@ jnv3

You have been answered by several "godless atheists". Each time you post. you have been debunked. You keep posting the same vapid shite when you have been answered, you have had videos for high schoolers, links and books recommended to you. Which you admitted were above your limited understanding. And still you keep on.

There comes a point when stupid becomes fucking moronic...you have streaked past that marker like rat with its tail on fire.

You are nothing but a dullard and irritating troll, with enormous ego and catastrophic character defects.

Either learn from all the educational goodies that we have all patiently set out for you or just fuck off with your delusions. I am done with you..

Coincidence isn't objectively real, its just the way humans perceive things, like luck. Neither concept has anything to do with the probability of an event. Until you grasp this you will continue to make a fool of yourself. Though ironically you appear to think you've been poking fun at people who actually do understand it.

Now, magic apples, evidence and explanation please? Enthral us all with your acumen.