Fine tuning of the universe

58 posts / 0 new

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 17:55

TwanSky

I suggest the following explanation to the fine tuning argument:
BIG BANG
No conscious observation from within the universe yet, therefore it exists in a superposition state (quantum mechanically speaking). With that goes a Wavefunction that contains all the possible universes. In only ONE of them will evolve the FIRST conscious creature able of making the first observation. At that exact instance the wavefunction collapses and this universe of the first observer materializes into reality. The others never existed. Obviously, the universe in which a conscious observer evolves first is going to be the one in which the fine tuning is best.
DONE

Subscription Note:

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 18:03

arakish

And how do you know there ain

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:26

(Reply to #2) #3

TwanSky

The wavefunction collapse

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 18:42

Dave Matson

I doubt that consciousness

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:30

(Reply to #4) #5

TwanSky

I don't disagree, the fact is

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 20:16

Cognostic

Whatever you are using as a

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:35

(Reply to #6) #7

TwanSky

I am not defining

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:41

(Reply to #7) #8

Cognostic

You are of course wrong. We

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:49

(Reply to #8) #9

TwanSky

Of course I could be wrong.

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 19:41

(Reply to #9) #10

Cognostic

@Coming out of our Big Bang??

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 09:35

(Reply to #10) #11

TwanSky

Thanks, but I don't see how

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 21:35

#12

Sapporo

In my view, where universes

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:36

(Reply to #12) #13

TwanSky

I don't know for sure, but

Sat, 07/21/2018 - 21:58

#14

David Killens

How does anyone know that

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 16:41

(Reply to #14) #15

TwanSky

We don't know, that's the

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 17:11

(Reply to #15) #16

David Killens

I disagree. If it is a valid

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 19:33

(Reply to #16) #17

TwanSky

My argument has nothing to do

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 12:36

(Reply to #17) #18

Sheldon

" many people have come to

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 15:05

(Reply to #18) #19

TwanSky

Sorry...I should have said

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 15:42

(Reply to #19) #20

arakish

Antoine: I should have said

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 17:26

#21

Grinseed

There are current yhrories

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 19:37

(Reply to #21) #22

TwanSky

I really don't know. Where do

Sun, 07/22/2018 - 21:08

#23

Nyarlathotep

Antoine - following quantum

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 09:47

(Reply to #23) #24

TwanSky

When I say "disappear", I am

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 00:14

#25

arakish

Reference Post: http://www

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 09:56

(Reply to #25) #26

TwanSky

Well...I don't know if the

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 15:57

(Reply to #26) #27

arakish

Antoine: Well...I don't know

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 01:19

#28

Cognostic

@"That the theory sucks, I

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 08:23

#29

LogicFTW

Why does the universe need to

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 08:43

(Reply to #29) #30

arakish

And that is something I have

Mon, 07/23/2018 - 15:11

(Reply to #30) #31

TwanSky

Of course, life adapts to its

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.

You are here

Subscription Note:

Pages