I was in my philosophy class where we discuss the "meaning of life", and unanswerable questions. The topic came up of what is the function of being human. My response to the idea initially was that human function varies between the individuals, but after due consideration I stated that human function was merely to survive, and that hobbies, pleasures, sources of pain and happiness were direct products or a collateral result from our evolution. Is there anything inherently wrong with this assumption? I'm mainly looking for feedback from atheists but any feedback would be appreciated.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
