The Codex Sinaiticus

24 posts / 0 new
Last post
mykcob4's picture
The Codex Sinaiticus

While watching 'Discovering the Bible' on the Smithsonian Channel, I learned that the oldest bible in print is the Codex Sinaiticus. It contradicts today's accepted bibles, (the Holy Bible, and the King James Bible) y a great deal. The Codex's version doesn't include 12 verses of Mark's gospel that describes Christ arising from the dead and revealing himself to 500 eye witnesses. A most troubling problem for modern christians to say the least.
The problem for christians today is that nothing substantiates their version of the bible. Today's bibles are copies of bibles that were "created" in the 11th century. These bibles are full of mistakes and political edits. Plus there is no outside source that validates their claims.
Now the Codex lays to rest about the controversy of 500 eye witnesses that saw jesus rise again. It never happened. In the Codex, the Gospel of Mark, christ's tomb was visited by a handful of women that found the tomb empty and disturbed. They were overcome by fear and told noone what they had discovered. There were no firsthand accounts, no eye witnesses, and no accounts outside the bible of the event. Even at that the accounts in the bibles today are much different than the accounts of the oldest known bible.
The Codex was discovered by Constantin von Tischendorf in 1844 at Saint Catherine's just below Mount Sinai. The Codex was written in Greek which also leads to speculation about how accurate they are, even though they are only 300 years removed from the time of christ.

RE: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-versions-...

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

watchman's picture
Link to an "on-line" resource
mykcob4's picture
Thanks for the link
ThePragmatic's picture
Great link, thank for sharing
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
yes mark was the first gospel
mykcob4's picture
I thought the same thing. If
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
Yep but it is important to
nekoburo's picture
So very interesting. However,
doubleAtheist's picture
I learned alot from this
chimp3's picture
The link that mykob4 provides
mykcob4's picture
I was checking the timeline
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
Luke 24:50–51
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
The ascension is most likely
mykcob4's picture
Actually there were many
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
Yep Jesus attributes is a
mykcob4's picture
I knew a priest that had a
Jeff Vella Leone's picture
Yea he was right, I don't
watchman's picture
Find links to on-line
Dave Matson's picture
The gospels provide a
curtisabass's picture
Can anyone here direct me to
Sir Random's picture
I don't know what you hope to
Dave Matson's picture
mykcob4,
victorpatrick's picture
While the Codex Sinaiticus
sahilsharma's picture
The Super Meteor 650 leg

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.