Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Log in or create an account to join the discussions on the Atheist Republic forums.
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
FREE E-BOOKS
Get the book "Why There Is No God" and one more book for FREE!
Sign up below for the Atheist Republic Newsletter to get the books.
Record Your Message!
Record your voice here for it to be aired on the Atheist Republic Voicemails Podcast.
Send us your views and opinions, your personal stories, messages of support, comments on recent news, or any comments you would like to share about your part of the world.
Note : By clicking record you are allowing us to broadcast your message on any of our platforms.
Affiliate Disclaimer
Links to atheist related books, shirts and movies and other atheism related products are affiliate links.
All proceeds will go to keeping the Atheist Republic website up and running; providing resources, advocacy, community tools and encouragement to atheists all over the world.
" but according to google"
I've been arguing with someone who thinks Google alone is a credible source.
Can I have my rope noose yet?
I am claiming 1 of the 3 concepts i have stated
Is how existence started or not started based on what we know today. It is facts that 98 percent of the population subscribe to1 of 3 of the concepts i have stated.
"It is facts that 98 percent of the population subscribe to1 of 3 of the concepts i have stated."
From where did you acquire this information?
If google isnt credible then nothing is, no matter what documentary or scientist you claim as creditable i can very much disagree as one has done with Stephen hawking on this site.
Can you provide a link?
This repeating cycle of explanation is annoying
I have explained already which make me question if you are actually reading what im saying but skiming threw and waiting to respond.
I just want to see what you've read with my own eyes. I'm not just gonna take your word for it.
"The university expands and contracts in an infinite cycle." - Xavier De Forres
Really? Show me how to get there! I want to attend.
I'll get to you in a moment.
From combining 84%(religious population) and 14%(athiest population) equals 98% of the world subscribes to 1 of 3 ways to start a universe which the beliefs of both sides are in the 3 ways i explain.i have already explained that even if google wasn't accurate it would still be a high percentage based on the probability of google being extremely off on the religious and athiest population considering that is a relatively an easy statistic to collect.
No. Give me a link to where you got this information.
Well?
"There has been no other scientific opinions on how a universe or universes can start very smart people past and present had or has 1 of 3 beliefs i have stated. I think its safe to say that most athiest are scientific and could believe in either 1 of 3 scientific concepts. Religious beliefs is based on something that can always exist which is 1 of the 3 concepts i have stated. Athiest is 14% of the population and religious views are 84% making 98% of the world population believes in 1 of the 3 ways to start a universe that i have stated.
"This repeating cycle of explanation is annoying."
It's easy to claim there are only X ways something can happen, when you ignore any suggestions to the contrary.
A high percentage of the world population believes in 1 those 3 ways. do you know any other scientific concepts of the origin were something can exist?
How do you know that? What is your source? I'm assuming your making this shit up.
proof
pro͞of/
noun
1.
evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
"you will be asked to give proof of your identity"
synonyms: evidence, v̲e̲r̲i̲f̲i̲c̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲c̲o̲r̲r̲o̲b̲o̲r̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲a̲u̲t̲h̲e̲n̲t̲i̲c̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲c̲o̲n̲f̲i̲r̲m̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲c̲e̲r̲t̲i̲f̲i̲c̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲d̲o̲c̲u̲m̲e̲n̲t̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲v̲a̲l̲i̲d̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲a̲t̲t̲e̲s̲t̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲,̲ ̲s̲u̲b̲s̲t̲a̲n̲t̲i̲a̲t̲i̲o̲n̲ ̲
"proof of ownership"
Give me something that fits this definition, and then I'll take you seriously.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-popularity.html
Kataclismic the reason that is wrong is because i dont consider what im saying to being true but to be considered based on popularity.
" i dont consider what im saying to being true but to be considered based on popularity."
Dowannaha?
Use any sense of critical thinking and common sense and i will take you seriously.
Stop avoiding the burden of proof and I might.
Considered meaning possible and based on popularity is one of the factors for it to be considered
I don't consider anything on popularity, but on its own merits. Dismissed.
I have already explained that this theory does require proof but common sense and critical thinking skills to be understood which the people who has commenting on this matter has been lacking
Yes, you have been lacking in that. I'm glad we've made progress. No, you have not provided anything close to the definition I kindly provided for you.
Considering based on popularity is how witches get burned.
I dont need proof for me to consider something,
I need logical sense. For example if someone explains a faster route to get to a location i will consider it, but if the explanation takes me extremely off route and the opposite direction i will not aka logical sense have you heard of it?
If you want others to agree with you here, you need proof.
Kataclismic popularity is one of many factors in
Considering something. Considering burning witches does not mean you will burn witches. Based on the accusations made on witches it would be foolish not to consider killing witches if the accusations were true but we all know they were not.
Pages