Despite atheists claiming you can have morality without religion, I will simply point out the ironic logical inconsistencies in asserting such a claim

Morality, just like heaven is a religious concept. It's like an atheist trying to prove angels exist but God doesn't. Angels are creations of God after all.

More intelligent atheists like Friedrich Nietzsche realized this.

https://i.imgur.com/UJSaWIp.png
Source: "The Twilight of Idols" (1889) Nietzsche

Morality i.e good/bad (or right/wrong ; justice/injustice) are defined by God. By definition what good is what God says it is, and vice versa.

Obedience to God's commandments is what is defined as good and disobedience to his commands is defined as bad. The logic is that simple

Now when atheists try to separate morality from God they also need to come up with a logical reason. They get their reasoning from classical liberalism, or a variation of John Stuart Mill's harm principle

https://i.imgur.com/WurWmNS.png
https://i.imgur.com/TRBb253.png

Source: "On Liberty" (1859) John Stuart Mill & https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-012-9406-7

This reasoning can be explained as such:

"Happiness and pleasure should be maximized"

"Do what ever you want as long as you don't harm anyone"

Or as the US Declaration of Independence says

"The pursuit of happiness"

The simple refutation to atheism is that atheism itself causes harm and unhappiness

I'm sure you've all seen these mountains of scientific papers on how atheism harms human health, I don't need to show you all of em do I, but here's a example

https://i.imgur.com/GNuMHoh.png

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10943-017-0400-6

Wearing hijabs is proven to benefit a woman's mental health, promote body sensitivity, reduce sexual objectification/harassment

Yet atheism in France try to ban hijab, directly harming women. You see the inconsistency.

https://i.imgur.com/FVVhvi9.png
https://i.imgur.com/xX09dYj.png

Sources: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1740144509001041

And that's it, the argument is over, I win again. It's just that easy to refute and debunk atheism. It can be done in minutes.

Even PhD atheist philosophers like Dr. Lars Gule admit this, in this video here, that under atheism's illogical attempt at creating a secular version of morality, they can logically permit bestiality, or in this case sex with pet dogs (of course in Islam that's a death sentence, in atheism it's a human right to have sex with your pet dog)

https://twitter.com/enigmaoftruth1/status/1191857183572549632/video/1