@The Intruder

You have addressed nothing, your vapid rhetoric hand waving is meaningless. As is your dishonest denial objective scientific facts.

All you've done is start a new thread to ignore and evade the responses and questions from your original thread. You have yet to evidence your opening claims in the OP as requested, you refuse to Ave knowledge your use if known logical fallacies, you won't respond to the question what objectivecevidence can you demonstrate for any deity with either a yes, no, or some evidence.

You have also not addressed your dishonest misrepresentation of atheism as a belief.

In short you have crossed the line from wilful ignorance, to deliberate mendacity.

Endless repetition won't make your claims any less facile, irrational or unevidenced. Start all the threads you want, your dishonest evasion will still be manifest for all to see, as are your lies making up straw man claims about science and assigning them to me.

Again I am left wondering what you hope to achieve here?

The Intruder "Miracles. God. Afterlife...."

I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate a shred of evidence for those (unevidenced) claims, that you ironically claim are proof?

Edited: spelling & grammar, and clarity.

The Intruder

YOU: "How many beliefs that form no part of your superstitious religious beliefs, do you hold that no objective evidence can be demonstrated for? (list them please)"

Well when you explain "superstitious religious beliefs", i may understand your question and respond.

We already know you only deny scientific facts that contradict your superstitious religious beliefs, like species evolution, and the bias of that is self evident, your embarrassing evasion is truly risible though, do you seriously expect us to believe you don't know what religious beliefs are, or that you can't google the definition of superstitious? I'm actually embarrassed for you.

"YOU: "Since you insist on repeatedly and dishonestly rehashing an argumentum ignorantiam fallacy that attempts to reverse your burden of proof, please tell us what "proof" you have that unicorns and mermaids, and all other deities humans have ever created are not real?"

You are not communicating here, just reliving your emotions via words. Not new though."

That's another risible lie from you, since the fallacies you used have been thoroughly explained to you, so your attempt at face saving here is truly cringeworthy. You have relentlessly tried too reverse the burden of proof for your claim a deity exists, by demanding atheists disprove it, yet are happy to disbelieve things you cannot disprove, which is the very definition of hypocrisy, and dishonest as well of course. I'd have more respect if you had the candour to admit it went over your head.

@Cognostic

Blathering bullshit, kudos you nailed him precisely. You have to hope he is trolling, otherwise it really is an embarrassing display.

Edited: typo...

@David Killens

The Intruder set his stall out fairly early on here, and once they start sneering at objectivity and objective evidence, well there's not a lot left to debate, as one can believe just about anything one wishes when the bar for evidence is set so low that it actually disappears and is replaced by the theistic nonsense of individual personal experience.

NB Theists often try to rubbish all evidence as personal experience at that point, as in one must personally experience scientific evidence, thus it is no different to unevidenced claims for their individual personal experience. I am disinclined to point out how stupid that claims is, as there seems little point engaging with a claim so obviously disingenuous.

The only alternative to it being rank dishonesty is it being rank stupidity, that actually believes objectively validated data is no different to someone claiming to have experienced something that they can demonstrate no objective evidence to support. Either way debate becomes rather moot at that point, as we have seen from multiple theists.

@Poison Ivy Re: "That dude (Intruder) is probably a troll"

Probably???... Hmmm... And I'm guessing the universe is probably big... *chuckle*... The problem with Intruder, though, is that he is so terrible at it he gives other trolls a bad name.

@Cog Re: "I have suggested that he begin with snowmen, move up to strawmen, eventually Tin men, and only then horses, dogs and roaches before attempting humans."

Ahem!... *clearing throat*... For your information, Mr. Smartie-pants, your order of intelligence is all wrong. I recently got tested and placed in between the horsie position and the doggie position, thank-you-very-much.... *sudden concerned look*... Uh, wait.... Something about that just doesn't exactly sound very good.... *scratching head*...

By the way....

Hey, Intruder! Where the fuck are you?!? In case you haven't noticed, it is quite obvious Old Man and Cog need Jesus! Don't waste this opportunity to perform a miracle in the name of your all-loving imaginary best friend!