Abortion

124 posts / 0 new
Last post
RedleT's picture
Abortion

I'm in an ethics class and I am fairly sure we will be discussing abortion at some point, so I figure I should think about it a little bit. Plus I am pretty passionate about the issue in general.

1. It is always wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human person.

2. All living humans are human persons.

3. A fetus in and from a human mother is human (separate from the mother and not part of her body).

4. Therefore, a human fetus is a human person.

5. Abortion is the intentional killing of a human fetus (fertilized egg to just before live birth for the sake of this argument).

6. Therefore, abortion is wrong.

This argument is certainly valid. It's also sound but that is what we'll be discussing. I'll answer objections instead of trying to defend the premises from the onset. However, I would like to say that even if 1 is wrong, you would still need morally sufficient reasons for killing an innocent person which should be a pretty high bar. If you disagree with 2 then you better give some pretty good and impartial reasons. If you disagree with 3 go read a science book and 5 is pretty much the definition of an abortion.

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

mykcob4's picture
You make statement and
jonthecatholic's picture
You may agree that judges can
RedleT's picture
Are judges infallible? The
Flamenca's picture
1. It is always wrong to
RedleT's picture
I don't actually think you
Flamenca's picture
Hi, Dumb Ox. Let me put it
Flamenca's picture
I'd like to add about late
RedleT's picture
Sure babies can live with
Flamenca's picture
You has just said it: Babies
Nyarlathotep's picture
Dumb Ox - But they can live
mykcob4's picture
Moral relativist? What the
watchman's picture
@DO .....
LucyAustralopithecus's picture
This topic is very close to
RedleT's picture
Think about it. Can a mom
LucyAustralopithecus's picture
No, you still cannot tell a
RedleT's picture
So do you are do not agree we
Flamenca's picture
Murder a baby already born is
jonthecatholic's picture
To be fair, here, Lucy, non
Flamenca's picture
- Where is the consideration
Nyarlathotep's picture
Dumb Ox - This argument is
LogicFTW's picture
@orignal post from Dumb Ox
RedleT's picture
Okay so a human organism is
mbrownec's picture
I have a GREAT topic for your
Flamenca's picture
+1000. Mbrownec. Less moral
RedleT's picture
Lol this is just ignorant.
Flamenca's picture
No, parenthood planning and
Nyarlathotep's picture
Dumb Ox - Finally, you have
LucyAustralopithecus's picture
Where does this argument
RedleT's picture
Right, but your finger nails
Harry33Truman's picture
The debate about abortion is

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.