Dutch Police Refuse to Guard Jewish Sites Due to 'Moral Objections'

Concerns have been raised over the Netherlands’ police force after reports emerged that some Dutch police officers are refusing to guard Jewish buildings and protect Jewish community events for ideological reasons. 

Dutch police chiefs admitted they changed duty rotas to accommodate police officers who have “moral objections” to guarding Jewish interests and places, including the Netherlands’ Dutch National Holocaust Museum in the Jewish Cultural Quarter of Amsterdam, the country’s capital.

There is no hard and fast policy,” Mireille Beentjies, a spokeswoman for the leadership of the Dutch national police force, said. “The line is that police staff are allowed to have moral objections.

We take moral objections into account when we make the rotas. But if there is an urgent job to do, they go on duty whether they want to or not,” she added. “You are expected to behave professionally. Others shouldn’t notice anything.

Beentjies argued that Dutch police officers were made to guard institutes and events they found morally objectionable in other circumstances.

It pains them when the Quran is burned, but at the same time, they still have to protect the people who do it,” she stressed. 

Marcel de Weerd and Michel Theeboom, two officers representing the Netherlands’ Jewish Police Network, expressed their concerns that police officers were allowed to opt out of duties that clashed with or contradicted their personal views.

There are colleagues who no longer want to protect Jewish targets or events. They talk about ‘moral dilemmas,’ and I see a tendency emerging to give in to that. That would truly mark the beginning of the end. I’m concerned about that,” Theebom said. 

During the preparations for security at the Holocaust Museum, there were colleagues who didn’t want to be rostered in,” Theebom added. “You’re allowed to get food and drink in the building while on duty, for example, but they didn’t want to.

De Weerd supported Theebom’s claims, adding, “We see that leadership is struggling with this. Especially now, with the conflict in the Middle East, we risk drifting away from what we should stand for as a collective. We need to keep discussing this with each other.

De Weerd also claimed that many younger Dutch police officers were ignorant of the country’s history, particularly the mass collaboration of Dutch police with the Nazis during the Second World War and the Holocaust, where over 75% of Dutch Jews were murdered.

In response to these concerns, Janny Knol, the Commissioner of the Dutch National Police, seeks to hold “an internal conversation on how to deal with such dilemmas.

Police officers are human beings and have the right to their own opinions and emotions,” Knol said. However, she stressed that “when it comes to people’s safety, that is our top priority. We are here for everyone. That is the foundation of our work as police officers.

While Knol said that “there can be no discussion” in the conversation she vowed to initiate, she did not mention any intention to discipline officers who opt out or are seeking to opt out of protecting Jewish buildings, events, and citizens. 

Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch Parliament and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), condemned Dutch police officers who refused to guard Jewish buildings and events.

Unacceptable. If an officer does not want to guard Jewish objects, that is grounds for dismissal,” Wilders wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter).

If you like our posts, subscribe to the Atheist Republic newsletter to get exclusive content delivered weekly to your inbox. Also, get the book "Why There is No God" for free.

Click Here to Subscribe

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.