There's been too much written here for me to comment on everything, but there are some interesting ideas floating around here that I found humorous.

Humorous Thing #1: The blatant, careless, thoroughly reckless tendency of creationists to hijack and manipulate any modern idea in theoretical physics for the purpose of demonstrating the existence of an old man in the sky. SoG uses the Penrose-Hawking theorem and the BVG theorem as seemingly incontrovertible evidence that the Universe began to exist. But what's worse, I didn't see a single person here bring up the immediate objection, the objection which led Hawking himself to abandon his ideas with Penrose: these results only apply to a classical spacetime with general relativity. They do not incorporate quantum effects, and hence they cannot be a final description of the emergence of the Universe, or of reality itself. SoG, clearly I can tell that your understanding of physics is so superior to mine I shouldn't even bother. But how's your sense of history doing? Did you happen to read this book called A Brief History of Time? It came out in 1988, and if you'd read it you may have come across the following gem by Hawking:

"So in the end our [Hawking and Penrose] work became generally accepted and nowadays nearly everyone assumed that the universe started with a big bang singularity. It is perhaps ironic that, having changed my mind, I am now trying to convince other physicists that there was in fact no singularity at the beginning of the universe—as we shall see later, it can disappear once quantum effects are taken into account."

Humorous Thing #2: What do Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Alan Guth (some of the people cited by creationists in favor of their beliefs) along with thousands upon thousands of other professional physicists have in common? They're atheists. Here is Hawking himself last year:

"Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. What I meant by 'we would know the mind of God' is, we would know everything that God would know, if there were a God, which there isn't. I'm an atheist." (http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/im-atheist-stephen-hawking-god-spac...)

Humorous Thing #3: The Cosmological Argument has already been defeated several dozen times over in the history of modern philosophy (starting with Hume in the 18th century). I've posted my own refutation of it in this forum. It exists now more as a cautionary tale in how to avoid bad philosophy, rather than as anything that should be taken seriously.

/End of my two cents